A HOLYROOD committee has called for an end to “hefty” payouts to public-sector leaders who leave after causing problems in their organisations.
MSPs on the Scottish Parliament’s Public Audit Committee have raised concerns about the practice with Finance Secretary Derek Mackay, claiming that severance payments in such a situation are essentially “rewarding failure”.
The committee wrote to Mackay after reports by the Auditor General for Scotland highlighted various financial and governance concerns in public bodies.
MSPs said there were “some instances where individuals who may have been at least partly responsible for a performance issue at a public body were no longer in post” by the time they came to consider the public spending watchdog’s report.
This had “created some frustration about whether such individuals have been satisfactorily held to account,” the committee told Mackay.
They also said the situation “raises questions about how they are recompensed”, and with the government consulting on severance policy for the public sector, made clear that “in the circumstances we have described”, payout awards should be “very carefully considered by the body in question”.
Acting convener Jackie Baillie said: “We are concerned that some of those responsible for creating major problems within public bodies may be leaving without being held to account for the issues they may have caused. What’s worse is that some of these individuals could leave with a hefty pay-off in their pockets, which is essentially rewarding failure and is understandably frustrating for the Scottish public who pay for these public services.”
She said the committee had written to Mackay “to ensure that the Scottish Government puts an end to rewarding failure as part of its severance policy for Scotland.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The Scottish Public Finance Manual provides guidance on settlement agreements, severance, early retirement and redundancy, making clear that financial compensation should only be offered on a value-for-money basis with issues of propriety and regularity fully examined.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here