AFTER day one of the Brexit negotiations it was clear the UK had capitulated to the EU’s demands on timetable, the divorce bill and the refusal to discuss a future relationship before an exit deal was agreed.
In a blow to Brexit Secretary David Davis, trade talks between the UK and European Union will now not begin until October at the earliest as the Brexit negotiations follow the timetable set out by Brussels.
The UK Government had wanted the talks to take place in parallel but has now accepted the timetable set out by the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier.
European Commission official Barnier warned the UK faced “substantial” consequences as a result of Brexit but insisted it was “not about punishment” or revenge.
And in a reference to Prime Minister Theresa May’s negotiating mantra, he said: “For both the European Union and the United Kingdom, a fair deal is possible, and far better than no deal.”
After the first day of the crucial negotiations, which have the potential to shape the UK’s economic and political future for a generation, it was agreed that working groups of officials would aim to make progress on the issues of citizens’ rights, the UK’s financial settlement – the so-called divorce bill – and other issues to do with separation.
The most senior officials on either side will lead work on efforts to resolve the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, a situation Barnier acknowledged was “politically sensitive” at a time when the Tory government was seeking the support of the Democratic Unionist Party to prop up May’s minority government.
Only when “sufficient, concrete progress” on the first phase has been made will Barnier recommend to the European Council that the negotiations can enter the next stage, taking in the future trading relationship, with that recommendation possibly coming at October’s summit of EU leaders.
After seven hours of talks in Brussels, Davis – who had previously promised the “row of the summer” over the timetable for the negotiations – said he was optimistic about the talks. Both sides acknowledged the clock was ticking, with the date for the UK’s departure from the EU fixed for March 2019.
Davis denied suggestions the agreed timetable showed Britain’s “weakness” and insisted it was “completely consistent” with the government’s aim of parallel trade and exit talks.
“It’s not when it starts – it’s how it finishes that matters,” he said.
“The UK has been crystal clear in our approach to the negotiations, the withdrawal process cannot be concluded without the future relationship also being taken into account.
“They should be agreed alongside each other – this is completely consistent with the Council’s guidelines which state nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.”
Davis also brushed off the idea Britain’s negotiating stance could change given political instability in the UK.
The Brexit Secretary said: “The position hasn’t changed, we have the Lancaster House speech, the two white papers, and the Article 50 letter, all backed up by a manifesto too. So it’s the same as it was before.”
Asked if he had given any ground to Britain, Barnier said: “I am not in a frame of mind to make concessions, or ask for concessions. It’s not about punishment, it is not about revenge.
“Basically, we are implementing the decision taken by the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, and unravel 43 years of patiently built relations.
“I will do all I can to put emotion to one side and stick to the facts, the figures, and the legal basis, and work with the United Kingdom to find an agreement in that frame of mind.”
He added: “The United Kingdom has decided to leave the European Union, it is not the other way around.
“The United Kingdom is going to leave the European Union, single market and the customs union, not the other way around.
“So, we each have to assume our responsibility and the consequences of our decisions. And the consequences are substantial.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel