HILLARY Clinton asked Gordon Brown to intervene in a row between the Edinburgh International Film Festival, the Israeli Embassy in London, and filmmaker Ken Loach.
According to emails released on Monday, in 2009 the then Secretary of State asked her officials to press Brown to intervene after Loach convinced the film festival to reject a grant from the Israeli government to cover the travel expenses of Tali Shalom Ezer, whose film Surrogate was being shown in Edinburgh.
At the time Loach called for a boycott of the festival after it announced the Israeli film in the programme: “The massacres and state terrorism in Gaza make this money unacceptable. With regret I must urge all who might consider visiting the festival to show their support for the Palestinian nation and stay away.”
In an email urging Clinton to get involved, prominent members of the US Jewish lobby said Edinburgh’s film festival, one of the world’s oldest, was inherently anti-Semitic.
Clinton was contact by Brian Greenspun, the publisher of the Las Vegas Sun newspaper, who forwarded an email from his brother-in-law, Bruce Ramer, former president of the American Jewish Committee.
Ramer warned that the festival’s decision could damage a UK-Israel treaty on film production. He wrote: “We need, for many reasons, to have the US protest and condemn this outrageous boycott and to oppose the anti-Semitism inherent in it”.
Ramer continued: “Because of the inherent wrongness of it and that if it succeeds, it will encourage and motivate those who fomented the boycott to other, probably even worse, action”.
Greenspun warned Clinton that there was “no voice” speaking out against Loach.
Clinton replied to say she was working on “the most effective way forward”, adding: “We have some good ideas as to what our govt can do, but we also want to see pressure from local people brought on the British and Scottish govts.”
Clinton then tasked deputy chief of staff at the State Department, Jacob Sullivan, to “reach out to the community in London and Edinburgh to urge them to raise this with PM Brown and other govt officials? We’d like to see top down and bottom up pressure. Let me know what you think.”
In the end, the film festival paid directly for Ezer’s trip to Edinburgh, rather than accept the Israeli government’s money.
The email exchange was part of a tranche from Clinton’s private server.
The Democrat presidential hopeful has come under fire for using the hdr22@clintonemail.com address rather than her official, secure State Department address. It only came to light after journalists found themselves unable to use Freedom of Information to access information held in correspondence.
Clinton has since handed over the emails.
Also in the new bundle released on Monday was correspondence from David Miliband who confided in Clinton that losing the Labour leadership election was “tough” and having won the support of the party members and MPs made it “doubly so”, adding ruefully: “When it’s your brother…”.
Clinton seemed keenly interested in Labour infighting as the 2010 general election loomed. Her close advisor Sidney Blumenthal sent her frequent updates on Gordon Brown’s crumbling government.
Blumenthal was also pretty scathing of David Cameron’s cabinet.
He warned Clinton that William Hague was “deeply anti-European and will be disingenuous with you”.
David Cameron, Blumenthal said: “Would be superficially friendly and privately scornful”. He continued: “Class has a lot to do with the contempt. A Cameron government would be more aristocratic and even narrowly Etonian than any Conservative government in recent history.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here