NICOLA Sturgeon yesterday refused to take a side on fracking as opponents pushed her to rule it in or out.
The First Minister insisted she would continue to take a “cautious” approach to fracking and unconventional gas extraction until all the evidence is in.
The comments came at First Minister’s Questions as she confirmed the timetable for the conclusion of evidence-gathering and public consultation on the subject will be published before the parliament breaks for recess on October 10.
Following a question from Labour’s Sarah Boyack on the release date, Sturgeon said the current moratorium on such practices will last “as long as it takes for this government to have all the information, the health information, the environmental information, the information from public consultation to allow us to take a decision”.
Sturgeon added: “We are determined to lead a precautionary, careful, cautious, evidence-based approach to this. I think that’s what the people of Scotland want.”
Green co-convener Patrick Harvie, who opposes fracking, and Tory Murdo Fraser, who is in favour of it, also pressed Sturgeon on the issue.
She said this illustrated the need for a “sensible” approach, adding: “I have had a question from somebody who wants me straight away to rule it out and now I have got a question from Murdo Fraser who wants me to straight away rule it in.
“Neither approach would be justified because we don’t yet have the environmental, the health and the public consultation information to allow us to base a reasonable, precautionary, sensible judgement on.”
After the session, Boyack accused the First Minister of “hiding behind” the evidence-gathering process.
She added: “The public is clear where Scottish Labour stands on fracking and unconventional gas.
“We want a triple lock to protect communities from proposals and that includes a proper assessment of health environmental and climate risks, learning from experience in the rest of the UK, and giving communities a vote on any proposals.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here