HEALTH Secretary Shona Robison said she was “determined to tackle” the rising overtime costs for consultants in hospitals across Scotland after it was revealed that they had been paid £20 million in the past year for extra hours.
Spending on high-cost overtime has shot up by more than a third in the past two years with one doctor making an extra £375,000 last year on top of their salary. The British Medical Association blamed a consultants shortage amid rising demand.
Robison said there were a “number of reasons” for the increase in overtime costs and that it was a “small fraction” compared to the overall costs.
She added: “Clearly we have some gaps in certain specialities which are hard to fill. Sometimes there are vacancies which take a while to fill and there are sickness and maternity issues to cover, so boards sometimes do have to use people on a short-term basis. I also think its important to put that in a bit of perspective in that the figure spent on consultant overtime payments does represent a small fraction of the overall cost of consultant staff, less than three per cent of the £720m a year that we spend on consultant medical staff.
“So this represents a small amount, but clearly something we need to tackle and something we are determined to tackle.”
Medical leaders insisted consultants’ overtime payments were “not at all extortionate” despite figures showing an increase of almost 50 per cent in just two years.
NHS boards paid out £20.92m in overtime and additional pay to some doctors in 2015-16 compared to £14.27m in 2013-14, according to data revealed under Freedom of Information.
Two of Scotland’s 14 regional health boards did not respond, meaning the overall total could be higher, as it was reported consultants could be paid £600 in overtime for four hours of work.
Dr Peter Bennie, chair of the BMA in Scotland, said the increase in overtime was due to a lack of staff.
He added: “The overall picture here is the straightforward issue of there simply not being enough consultants on the ground to do the jobs.”
He added that 162 consultancy posts had been empty for six months of more – saying this alone represented approximately £15m not currently being paid by health boards.
“That balances out quite a bit of this,” Bennie said. “The issue for us is – and has been for some time – that there are not enough consultants to do the job, and that actually applies across all branches of medicine: there is a similar problem with general practice.
“The main figure that is being quoted is £600 for four hours work. That’s four hours of work, almost always at weekends or late into the night. That’s working out to about £85 an hour after tax and it seems to be that that is not at all extortionate for a group of the most highly-trained and most expert people we have in the country in the health service.”
Dr Nikki Thompson, chair of the BMA’s Scottish Consultant Committee, said the level of vacancies was “not sustainable”.
He added: “High vacancy levels increase pressure on services and colleagues are having to work harder and longer to try to fill the gaps, making it even more challenging to attract staff to commit to working here.
“It is simply not sustainable.
We need proper workforce planning and adequate numbers of consultants, so that services can be properly planned and provided, without relying on what staff we do have working longer and longer hours.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here