THERE are 12 changes the Government needs to make for Scotland’s education system to be among the “best in the world”, according to a new report.
The first review of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence, undertaken by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), was largely positive, saying that achievement in science and reading was above the international average.
Scottish students, the report said, are resilient, and Scottish schools are inclusive, with the gender gap “not as wide as in many systems”.
There was also praise for a drop in school-age teenage smoking and alcohol consumption. However, there were stark warnings that the gap between the achievements of well-off pupils and poorer pupils was getting wider.
There were also concerns about standards in maths falling from high to average over the past 10 years and worries about a large number of low performers in secondary schools.
The OECD also pointed out that one-fifth of all Scotland schools are rated only “satisfactory” and one in 10 is “weak or unsatisfactory”.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the Government broadly accepted the OECD’s recommendations. One of those recommendations was to “create a new narrative for the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE)”, effectively re-branding and overhauling much of the management.
This would involve commissioning an independent, Scotland-wide evaluation of how CfE is being implemented and an attempt at simplifying and clarifying core guidance on the CfE. This, the report authors note, would require “deep-seated cultural beliefs” to change.
The report also said secondary schools needed to be more “stimulating and challenging learning environments”, particularly in poorer areas.
There was backing for the Government’s plans to introduce standardised testing, with the OECD saying the current system did not provide sufficiently robust information for policymakers, councils, schools or teachers.
Sturgeon said: “I am particularly pleased that the OECD supports our decision to develop and implement a National Improvement Framework. I firmly believe the framework will play an important role in driving work to close the attainment gap and continually improve Scottish education.”
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), said the report painted a “largely positive” picture. He said: “It confirms previous data that indicates Scottish schools and levels of pupil attainment compare well both internationally and with other countries within the UK.”
Chris Keates, general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT), said: “The report is clear that the direction of travel for the education system in Scotland is positive.
“It will be vital for the Scottish Government, as it takes forward its proposals for the National Improvement Framework, to address these concerns, particularly as the planned introduction of national assessments has the potential to drive up teacher workload still further, if not implemented carefully.”
Montserrat Gomendio, deputy director of the OECD Directorate for Education and Skills, said: “We applaud Scotland for having the foresight and patience to put such an ambitious reform as Curriculum for Excellence in place; we hope that our OECD review will help ensure that it will live up to its full potential and realise excellence and equity right across Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here