Police Scotland have rubbished claims that an official warning was issued because of fears of “threatening behaviour” from SNP supporters at the polls.
A media frenzy was whipped up this morning over allegations that the police and the Electoral Commission were expecting trouble because of an online campaign asking people to watch out for poll irregularities.
“Radical SNP activists could cause chaos at polls” trumpeted the Daily Express while the Daily Record and Daily Mail claimed the police had warned of “threatening behaviour” by SNP supporters who planned to follow ballot boxes to counting centres.
However a police spokesman said yesterday: “We have issued no warnings.”
And despite The National making that clear, broadcasters continued to claim otherwise long into the afternoon.
Similar claims were made during the Referendum, later denied by the police, that they were preparing for violence by SNP supporters. There was no trouble at the polls but the vote was followed by unionists rioting on September 19.
Yesterday’s story originated in the Guardian which claimed: “Police and election officials in Scotland have issued warnings to polling stations and local commanders after radical nationalists urged voters to photograph their ballot papers and follow ballot boxes to count centres on Thursday night.”
This was based on the launch of an online campaign urging people to watch out for irregularities at the election counts, following claims that last year’s Referendum result was fixed to favour the No vote.
Even though this was rejected by all the parties, including the SNP, a request was sent out online this week asking people to photographing their ballot papers at the polling station after checking to make sure they carried valid security markings then, if possible, follow the vans carrying the votes to the polling stations to make sure they arrived safely.
Simon Lott, a director of Glasgow-based Spectrum Systems, where the advice sheet apparently originated, told the Guardian the monitoring was intended to be peaceful and law abiding.
Despite this the paper went on to claim that both the police and the election authorities in Scotland had warned polling officials about the risk of trouble.
However while Police Scotland said they were aware of the online advice which, according to the Guardian, was called “Operation Scallop”, they denied any warnings had been issued.
Chief Superintendent Jim Baird said: “We are aware of this however we will not comment on specific details of security arrangements. I would like to take this opportunity to assure the public that appropriate policing and security arrangements will be put in place to ensure the election process runs smoothly. The safety and security of the process is a top priority for Police Scotland and we have been liaising with the Electoral Commission and returning officers and will continue to do so throughout.”
The media also picked up on the Guardian’s claim that “formal warnings” were sent by election authorities to polling officers to watch out for any “disruption” or “threatening behaviour”.
Again, while the Electoral Commission did give advice on people taking “selfies” or “boothies” in the polling stations as well as the issue of people following the vans with the ballot boxes, the guidance did not mention any risk of trouble.
The Commission’s statement read: “On the question of members of the public following the vans etc employed to deliver the ballot boxes from polling places to count centres we are aware of talk of such activity being undertaken on social media. In our view there is nothing in electoral law which prevents such activity and indeed occurs on occasion although we understand the incidence of this is rare. The question of public safety and that of the highway is of course a matter for Police Scotland to deal with.”
The Commission went on to say that the law relating to voters taking “selfies” in polling stations was complex.
“Whether an offence has been committed would depend on a number of factors, including whether the photograph was shared with others and what the photograph showed. Given the risk that someone taking a photo inside a polling station may be in breach of the law, whether intentionally or not, our advice is that you should not allow photos to be taken inside polling stations.
“Returning Officers should ensure that all polling station staff are aware of this guidance. We also suggested that Returning Officers consider displaying a notice inside polling stations to make clear that photography of any kind (including photos taken on mobile phones) is not permitted.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here