NICOLA Sturgeon has indicated her support for extending a far-reaching scheme to improve one of the poorest urban areas in Scotland.
In an interview yesterday, the First Minister backed the continuation of a pilot project that allows Glasgow City Council to take control of rundown properties in Govanhill.
The local authority was given enforcement powers last year in a bid to help it clamp down on rogue landlords blamed for poor housing and living condition in the area in Glasgow's south side.
The powers, brought in under the Housing (Scotland) Act 2014, allow the council to enter and seize control of four tenement blocks – known to have the highest concentration of landlords, overcrowding, anti-social behaviour and unhygienic conditions – and designate them an Enhanced Enforcement Area (EEA).
Improvement plans also involved the council and the Scottish Government supporting moves by Govanhill Housing Association to buy up 80 flats in the area over a two-year period and bring them into the public rented sector.
The scheme will have to be evaluated by the Scottish Government but in advance of the assessment Sturgeon, who represents the area as a constituency MSP, said she was in favour of it being extended.
“Govanhill Housing Association have actually got more properties than they expected, and that’s allowed them to consolidate their progress in these four blocks,” Sturgeon told a Sunday newspaper yesterday.
“[The scheme] definitely, in my view, needs to be extended.”
During the Holyrood election campaign the First Minister was accused of not caring about “deteriorating conditions” in her own constituency, but she rejected the claims.
“It’s not true, but I accept that goes with the job,” she said. “My office is in Govanhill, so I’m part of a community in the sense of being there physically.
"But if I was living in Govanhill I would also be frustrated and would look to point the finger at elected representatives. I don’t take umbrage at that. It’s my job to be part of finding solutions for Govanhill.”
She added that the argument for compulsory purchase had “probably” been made. She said: “Whenever possible we need to try and do it without compulsory purchase, because it is a lengthy and complicated process. I don’t want us to get into a situation where compulsory purchase is seen as the first option, which was part of testing out the programme without it. But you’re only going to get so far with voluntary acquisition, so my view is that compulsory purchase will be a part of the package in the next phases of the programme.”
A Glasgow City Council spokeswoman said: “The work being carried out in partnership to address the persistent housing problems in this area is making a positive difference. It’s great the
First Minister supports this and wants to extend it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here