A restaurant has been targeted by TripAdvisor trolls because of family links to independence support.
Rollo Restaurant in Edinburgh is run by Ailsa Rollo, who yesterday instructed the global review site to remove several critical reviews of the establishment thought to have been posted in response to a comment made online by her mother Alison several months ago.
In November, the artist suggested changing demographics could lead to a Yes vote within four years. She wrote: “Just been googling birth and death rates in Scotland. "By my calculations if we have another referendum in four years we could have another 320,000 more Yes voters than No voters.”
The comment was circulated online with the hashtag #SNPout and commenters admitted posting negative reviews of the business as revenge, with one Twitter user named MikeyUK saying: “Oh dear think of the negative TripAdvisor reviews that may be coming her way.”
Another, named Neil McDonald, said five bad reviews had been posted, adding that the restaurant’s response to the criticism was “class”.
One Twitter user named Special Agent 1722 admitted responsibility for some posts, saying: “Oh dear... four terrible reviews have been added to Rollo Restaurant’s TripAdvisor review page.”
He then added: “I did bring politics into my comment... schoolboy error! I’ll stick to bad food and cockroaches under the placemats”.
The reviews branded the establishment “grubby”, “seedy” and “disgusting”, but contained basic factual errors.
One mentioned finding hairs in the soup, a dish which has never been on the menu.
Another commentator wrote: “How terrible to want another human being’s business to fail. Shame on you.”
Yesterday the restaurant declined to comment on the row but Ailsa Rollo confirmed the negative comments had been removed after the business had made representations to TripAdvisor. She also stressed that the restaurant itself was apolitical.
The Raeburn Place establishment, which opened in December 2013, has an overall rating on the website of four and a half out of five, with most of the 237 reviewers listing it as “excellent”.
There are currently only six “poor” and five “terrible” scores.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here