THE Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) refused to answer questions on rising food bank use yesterday, as the UK Government hit out against “misleading” links to benefits problems and low wages.
In its annual report, The Trussell Trust said welfare payment delays and sanctions are the most common reason given by those turning to emergency food aid, with low income closely behind.
The charity network provided three-day supply packs for almost 133,730 people across Scotland in 2015-16, marking a new record. The total includes more than 43,960 children and comes as overall UK referrals broke the 1.1 million barrier.
According to research by the Trussell Trust and Hull University, reliance on food banks was highest in areas with large numbers of people in manual skilled work, or residents with health problems or disabilities that prevent them from working.
The results have been criticised from across the political spectrum and civic society, with Scottish Social Justice Secretary Alex Neil branding the disproportionately high level of usage in Scotland a “damning indictment” of Westminster policy.
Yesterday however, the DWP, which is responsible for both employment policy and welfare reform, dismissed such comments and refused to answer questions about what it can do to tackle the ongoing growth of food aid in wealthy Britain.
The department is now headed by Stephen Crabb MP following the departure of Iain Duncan Smith last month.
Following a request for comment from Crabb yesterday, a spokeswoman told The National the “subject matter of food banks goes beyond DWP policy areas” so neither the minister nor the department would respond.
Instead, a UK Government spokesman said: “Reasons for food bank use are complex, so it is misleading to link them to any one thing. The Government is determined to move to a higher wage society, introducing the new National Living Wage that will benefit over one million workers directly this year, and we’re also spending £80 billion on working-age benefits to ensure a strong safety [net] for those who need it most. The vast majority of benefits are processed on time and the number of sanctions have actually gone down.”
The number of Scots who used Trussell Trust food banks in 2015-16 grew more than 13 per cent on the previous year. Figures show Scotland is second only to north-west England in the number of people seeking help, where 160,050 referrals were received from a population of more than 7.1million.
Despite a difference in population of almost two million, the caseloads were only 26,320 apart and the charity says the level of need north of the Border is “disproportionately high”.
Yesterday, Ewan Gurr, Scotland Network manager at the Trussell Trust, maintained food-bank use is connected to low income and welfare problems.
He said: “Benefit delays, benefit changes and low incomes are definitely issues but the truth is we need to think about reforming the sanctions policy.
“People are being broken,” he added. “We need to get the issue of food poverty back in the public domain.”
Meanwhile, Oxfam Scotland head Jamie Livingstone said: “The real scale of hunger in Scotland is likely to be significantly higher as these figures do not include people who access the large number of other organisations proving food aid. There is no shortage of food in Scotland – this is about poverty.”
Reverend Sally Foster-Fulton, convener of the Church of Scotland’s Church and Society Council, said: “The latest figures on food bank use paints a worrying picture for Scotland. Throughout the country church congregations, faith groups and other volunteers are stepping in to help as the welfare state is falling short of people’s needs. To think what the situation would be without such volunteers does not bare considering.
“Our desire to meet the need we see before us must be matched by a desire for a world in which food banks are consigned to the history books.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here