GETTING high on a psychedelic drug extracted from “magic mushrooms” may provide lasting benefits for people tormented by incurable depression, new research suggests.
A small pilot trial of 12 patients with treatment-resistant depression – which in some cases had persisted for decades – found that every participant experienced a reduction in symptoms a week after taking the strictly controlled class A drug psilocybin.
Eight of the 12 (67 per cent) achieved full remission after a week and were temporarily liberated from their demons.
Three months after swallowing psilocybin capsules, seven patients continued to show an improvement and of these five remained depression-free.
However, the treatment involved a high dose of psilocybin, equivalent to eating several magic mushrooms.
All the patients had to “trip” on the drug, just as if they were taking it recreationally to experience its hallucinogenic effects, and all received psychological support to help them cope.Volunteers were carefully screened to exclude anyone with a history of suicide attempts, psychosis or drug dependence.
While anxiety affected every patient, the treatment produced few adverse side effects. Some patients reported confusion, nausea and headaches, and two suffered a brief episode of mild paranoia.
Lead scientist Dr Robin Carhart-Harris, from Imperial College London, said: “These experiences with psilocybin can be incredibly profound. Sometimes people have what they describe as mystical or spiritual-type experiences – that’s not uncommon, particularly with the high dose. So it’s important that we provide psychological support afterwards.
“We didn’t see anything unexpected and the adverse effects were mostly things that we predicted and were relatively mild. Nevertheless, the limitation of this treatment is the acute experience itself. It can be... psychologically challenging.”
He pointed out that all the patients taking part had been diagnosed with moderate to severe depression and had previously failed to respond to two different types of antidepressants. On average, the participants, who ranged in age from 30 to 64, had been suffering from depression for 18 years. One man of 40 had been ill with depression for 25 years and a woman of 43 had struggled for 30 years.
“This isn’t a magic cure, but even so the effects at this stage do look promising,” said Carhart-Harris.
The patients received two capsules of Home Office-licensed psilocybin one week apart. The first, given as a safety precaution, contained a low 10mg dose of the drug and the second a high 25mg dose. Patients were assessed one day after the first dose and then at one, two, three and five weeks, and three months, after the second dose.
Because the trial was not randomly controlled or blinded – all the patients knew what they were taking – the reliability of the results is open to question.
Carhart-Harris acknowledged that participants may have been influenced by attempts to help them relax, such as playing music, or experienced a therapeutic “placebo effect”. He added: “New treatments are urgently needed, and our study shows that psilocybin is a promising area of future research.
“The results are encouraging and we now need larger trials.”
The scientists, whose findings are reported in the journal The Lancet Psychiatry, hope to obtain funding for a larger randomly controlled trial which would compare the effects of psilocybin with those of an inactive “dummy” drug or other form of treatment.
One member of the team, former drug tsar Professor David Nutt, hailed the study as a “landmark” but lashed out at the “Kafkaesque” restrictions that made it so difficult to conduct research on psilocybin.
Because of the regulations and red tape, “it cost £1,500 to dose each patient when in any sane world it might have cost £30”, complained Nutt.
He argued that obstacles in the way of investigating the therapeutic potential of psilocybin could be lifted “overnight” if the Home Secretary reclassified it as a schedule two drug, which can be prescribed and supplied by doctors.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here