A MEDIC dubbed “Dr Death” has appointed Scottish lawyers amid concerns his Edinburgh Fringe show about assisted suicide could breach Scots law.
Dr Philip Nitschke, 67, a right-to-die campaigner who pioneered a short-lived euthanasia law in Australia, will demonstrate an assisted-dying device and tell euthanasia anecdotes at his Fringe show Dicing With Dr Death.
Nitschke was questioned under caution by Metropolitan Police upon his recent entry to the UK amid concerns about the content of his show.
With just two weeks to go until his show opens at The Caves in Edinburgh, the medic yesteray appointed Scottish lawyers to ensure it does not breach the law on advising, counselling or assisting others to commit suicide.
Anti-euthanasia group Care Not Killing has urged Police Scotland and the Crown Office to take a close look at the show. Green MSP Patrick Harvie, who piloted the recently-defeated Assisted Suicide Bill through Holyrood, welcomed Nitschke to Scotland provided his show is conducted “in a sensitive and respectful manner”.
Nitschke said: “We have to travel quite close to the edge, certainly the edge of the law if not necessarily the edge of good taste.
“The edge of the law is the reason the Metropolitan Police wanted to talk to me about the show, because giving information about these sorts of drugs can be construed as being in breach of the law which prohibits advising, counselling or assisting.
“We will be asking people attending the show to sign disclaimers for that very reason. The Metropolitan Police started by saying they want to have a chat about a show I was running in England, but that ended up being a cautioned interview. The director of public prosecutions must have been satisfied because they contacted my lawyers saying they had no reason at this stage to take this any further, so we are feeling a bit more comfortable.”
However, Nitschke has not spoken to Police Scotland or the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service about his show, which opens on August 6.
He added: “My lawyers provided me with Scottish lawyers this morning and I will ask their specific advice on that issue.”
Nitschke said he has some “amusing and certainly entertaining” anecdotes from his 20-year career in assisted dying.
“One person asked me for the best euthanasia drug available but I told him that it had been taken out of the hands of doctors and handed over to vets,” he said.
“His wife took me aside and said: ‘I don’t ever want my husband to know this as he is a sick and dying man, but I had an affair with a vet and he owes me a bloody big favour, so I’m going to call him in’. Unsurprisingly, he was one of the few people who was able to get a hold of this drug from a vet.”
Dr Gordon Macdonald, a spokesman for Care Not Killing, said: “The Lord Advocate said if you are seeking to assist someone to commit suicide that will be an offence under Scotland’s homicide legislation, so I think the Crown Office and the police should be taking a close look at what is being said at this show and deciding whether it is in breach of the law.
“We’re not in favour of closing down free speech as long as he is staying within the law and not encouraging people to take their own life.”
Harvie, who spearheaded Scotland’s assisted dying debate following the death of MSP Margo MacDonald after a long and painful illness, said: “At one level any contribution to a frank and open public discussion of death and dying is welcome, but it’s important that this debate is conducted in a sensitive and respectful manner.
“I was pleased that, with very few exceptions, that tone was taken when Scotland debated the Assisted Suicide Bill recently.
“I don’t want to judge this show without seeing it, but outright satire on the issue is one thing and serious debate about the life and death issues is another.”
MSPs rejected plans to legalise assisted suicide for the second time in May.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here