A COUNCIL has been accused of putting Orange parades before potholes — by using the roads budget to help pay for a controversial march.

Falkirk Council came under fire last month after agreeing to give the Loyal Orange Institution of Scotland £1,145 towards a planned walk through the town on Saturday, June 25. One of the largest events of its kind in Scotland, hundreds are expected to take part and thousands more are set to line the route.

When the funding was announced it was understood that it would come from the local Community Grant Fund, despite rules against making awards to groups with a religious or political message.

Opposition SNP councillors attempted to block the grant on the grounds of the impact it would have on the fund, which has been reduced from £110,000 to £94,000, and a previous decision to “subsidise” the event by allowing a moratorium on the £725 in fees for the necessary temporary traffic regulation orders.

The move, led by councillor David Alexander, also stated that the funding “doesn’t meet local criteria”.

However, this was defeated by the administration.

Yesterday, the story took another turn when it emerged that the cash will be taken from the budget for roads instead.

In a letter to Alexander, the council’s chief executive Mary Pitcaithly said: “My understanding is that the funding will not be found from the Community Grant Scheme but, rather, as part of the roads budget within Development Services as it is directed towards ensuring the safety of road users and the broader community.”

The issue was raised at a meeting of the executive committee yesterday, when council leader Craig Martin is said to have told members this had been “mentioned” during the previous session when the grant was agreed.

However, this mention is not included in official minutes of the meeting and has never been laid out by Martin or the council in public statements on the matter.

The issue emerged on the eve of today’s crucial vote of no confidence in Martin, who is accused by the SNP group of dodging responsibility on the Orange Order funding as well as a shelved HQ plan that has cost the taxpayer an estimated £560,000 – and could cost another half-a-million pounds to cancel.

Alexander told The National his attempt to prevent the grant should have been ruled incompetent if there was no intention to use the Community Grant Fund and said the issue was an example of a lack of transparency in the organisation.

Accusing the administration of attempting to avoid a potential challenge on the move, he said: “Public opinion is quite clear – it is a nonsense decision. There are issues of maladministration. Most people would be horrified by some of the things that happen up here. I would urge people to come to a council meeting.”

Yesterday, Martin did not respond to calls for comment.

However, the local authority said: “The decision has not been changed and the funding will come from a roads budget. While the original report did not state explicitly where funding was coming from, it was always the intention to use this budget and no other. Neither officers or individual members can alter decisions taken by the council’s executive.”

On today’s vote, Alexander said: “The purpose is to try and force change in the short term. In the long term, we hope the people of Falkirk will bring about the changes necessary when they go to the polls next year.”

He continued: “We have got a budget of £330 million, we have got £34m in reserves. Important decisions have to be taken between now and next May, and we are looking to get the highest standard possible within the administration.”