OPPONENTS of a new flightpath trial at Edinburgh Airport have described as “disingenuous” its report into the experiment.
Edinburgh Airport admitted that complaints peaked during last year’s TUTUR trial period with 7,934 being made by 567 people. It said more than 57 per cent of complaints were not about TUTUR flights but concerned aircraft operating on flightpaths that had existed since the runway was built in the 1970s. The airport claimed that 40 per cent of complaints had been received from five individuals.
However, Helena Paul from Stop Edinburgh Airspace Trial (SEAT) told The National: “This is such a disingenuous take it defies belief – it is downright irresponsible.”
She said it was inappropriate that the same organisation that stood to benefit from a new flightpath was allowed to manage complaints and communications about its operations without independent scrutiny.
“We have no means of knowing whether all communications and complaints have been properly recorded by the airport,” she said.
“We know that many critical comments were removed from their Facebook page, for instance. In one case a resident made over 650 complaints about aircraft noise yet the airport has advised that they have recorded only “over 300” complaints from that individual”.
Paul, from Blackness, West Lothian, said SEAT believed the reported complaints the airport received during the trial was a “significant undercounting” and an inadequate measure of the anger felt in communities.
“There were also over 1,200 signatures gathered on an online petition, with numerous paper petitions also circulated in many areas,” she added. “Noise complaints to the airport rocketed from a relatively steady 10-20 a quarter before the trial to nearly 8,000 during it, indicating a serious problem with the design of the trial and the manner it was conducted.
“Disturbance from aircraft noise has not stopped. Since the trial ended, many people across a wide area are now reporting problems with aircraft noise that did not exist previously. It is clear to thousands of people that the airport has changed the pattern of use of other flightpaths, despite denying that it has done so.”
An airport spokesman said its report showed the viability of one-minute separation times between aircraft departures at peak times, but added: “While the trial was a success – there is still work to do both technically and with our neighbouring communities.
“The majority of complaints received during the trial period came from a relatively small number of people who live in pockets of communities in West Lothian. While the majority of these complaints did not relate to flights on the TUTUR flight path, we take our neighbours’ concerns seriously.
“Our decision on TUTUR will be not be taken hastily.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here