LEGISLATION to promote the use of British Sign Language (BSL) was unanimously backed by MSPs last night.
The passage of the British Sign Language (Scotland) Bill, brought forward by Labour MSP Mark Griffin, was greeted with cheers and applause by campaigners in the Scottish Parliament’s public gallery.
It will require Scottish ministers to develop a national plan for BSL and place an obligation on public-sector bodies to prepare and publish their own plans.
The aim is to increase awareness of BSL and its use in the delivery of services.
During a debate on the bill at Holyrood, Griffin cited statistics from the Scottish Council on Deafness showing that 77 per cent of BSL users who visited hospital could not easily communicate with NHS staff.
He said: “It is that sense of abandonment and isolation – whether it be in a healthcare situation, in a school or an education situation – that I hope the passing of this legislation will address.”
Languages minister Dr Alasdair Allan said the Scottish Government would set up a BSL group to advise on the content of the national plan.
Labour equality spokeswoman Rhoda Grant said the bill “will send a strong message to the deaf and deaf-blind community that we value them and we value their language”.
Conservative education spokeswoman Mary Scanlon called for “an honest appraisal of postcode provision” of BSL in Scotland to identify gaps in availability, as well as a more accurate assessment of provision.
Avril Hepner, British Deaf Association community development manager in Scotland, said: “The success of the BSL (Scotland) Bill is a wonderful achievement.
“I am proud, as a Scottish person, to see my country leading the way in making the first ever BSL Act in the UK.”
Delia Henry, director of Action on Hearing Loss Scotland, said: “We congratulate Mark Griffin MSP on the passing of his bill and we hope the legislation will start to remove the communication barriers which affect the everyday lives of people who are deaf in Scotland, and ensure that vital services become fully accessible for BSL users.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here