ED Balls had the chance to attack George Osborne’s plans to make sweeping public spending cuts – but the Shadow Chancellor said instead that he would not reverse anything in the Tories’ Budget.
Those who argue there is little to choose between the two main Unionist parties were given further ammunition yesterday when Balls said in a radio interview that he would implement all of Osborne’s flagship policies.
“I thought it was quite empty,” he said of the Budget. “I don’t think there was too much in it. There’s nothing from yesterday
I need to reverse.”
Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts suggest the Conservatives’ plans will lead to a “rollercoaster” for public services, with the size of cuts more than doubling over the first two years before spending increases over the following two.
Balls said he was committed to a “sensible” mix of spending cuts and tax increases on the wealthy, but repeatedly refused to say where all of the savings in public spending would be made. “What I will reverse is a plan for deeper spending cuts in the next three years than the last five,” he said.
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon responded at First Minister’s Questions yesterday: “Is there any wonder that people are disillusioned with Labour?” she said. “There is nothing in the Budget he would reverse ... nothing in the Budget of a right-wing Tory chancellor that a new Labour Chancellor would choose to reverse? Really? There is plenty I’d like to reverse, including the austerity cuts which will be deeper than ever before. Ed Balls has just made our case for us.”
Balls insisted that the personal tax-free allowance level would stay at £11,000. When he was asked if he would reverse the changes to savings tax, he replied: “Of course not”. He went on to describe Osborne’s new ISA home-buyers policy as “an interesting idea”, adding: “We are absolutely not going to reverse it.”
Stephen Boyd, assistant secretary at Scottish union body the STUC said Balls was “wrong” to back Osborne’s policy announcements. He said: “The policies the Chancellor announced yesterday regarding assistance to savers and help to buy ISAs are bad policies, which have quite major distributional impacts. The Institute for Fiscal Studies showed today these policies benefit the wealthier to a greater extent, so we think this is bad policy.
“Things like the help-to-buy ISAs probably have about an 80 to 90 per cent deadweight cost as you are helping people who would be able to fund themselves, meaning it is a waste of significant amounts of money.
“These are measures, if there is to be a new Labour government, which they should address in their very first Budget statement.”
“If Labour think fiscal consolidation must continue, then it must be balanced much more towards tax rises for those who are able to afford them, rather than these kind of giveaways to already wealthy people.”
Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy said: “When it comes to Tory cuts, George Osborne’s Budget confirmed what we already knew – that the worst is yet to come. The Office for Budget Responsibility is clear, yesterday’s Budget will mean more cuts to public spending and more austerity if the Tories are re-elected in May.
“After the election the Tories have promised cuts to public spending that are four times deeper than this year. Every week will see a month of cuts.
“Those are the type of spending cuts which would scar Scotland for a generation.”
Osborne yesterday denied his party was planning to speed up the rate of cuts to public services. He said: “That is not actually the approach, as Conservatives, that we will take. We want to take a more balanced approach and we would not put all the cuts in government departments, as the OBR forecast shows.”
SNP Deputy Leader and Treasury spokesman Stewart Hosie MP said: “Under Osborne’s plans – and now Labour’s plans – there will be additional cuts to welfare, tax credits and public-sector pensions, with overall cuts set to be far larger than anything we have seen over the past five years.
“Those hoping a Labour government would offer an alternative to the Tories will be disappointed – but we already knew a majority of Labour MPs voted recently in the House of Commons hand in hand with the Tories for £30 billion of extra cuts in the next government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here