A DATE has been set for Boris Johnson to face MPs over the partygate scandal.
The former prime minister will be questioned over whether he misled parliament by the cross-party Privileges Committee on Wednesday, March 22, at 2pm. It has not yet been announced which other individuals will be questioned.
The committee released an update to its inquiry earlier this month in which it said the evidence strongly suggested it would have been "obvious" to Johnson that Covid rules were being broken at Downing Street gatherings he attended.
In April 2022, following a police probe and an investigation by civil servant Sue Gray, it was confirmed a string of rule-breaking gatherings had taken place in Number 10 and around Whitehall during the pandemic, with 126 fines issued in total including to Johnson, his wife Carrie and then chancellor Rishi Sunak.
READ MORE: SNP candidates say they'll work with Labour in exchange for indyref2
But it is what Johnson said in Parliament about the gatherings that the committee - made up of seven MPs - is looking at.
Johnson released a statement claiming the inquiry’s interim report showed he was being “vindicated” as he raised concern about investigator Sue Gray’s move to Keir Starmer’s office.
But the committee said: “The evidence strongly suggests that breaches of guidance would have been obvious to Mr Johnson at the time he was at the gatherings.
“There is evidence that those who were advising Mr Johnson about what to say to the press and in the House were themselves struggling to contend that some gatherings were within the rules.”
The Privileges Committee has said it will consider why Johnson told MPs that no guidance had been broken “when he knew what the guidance was and was in attendance at gatherings where the guidance was breached”.
READ MORE: Calls for SNP to reveal membership numbers amid report of 50,000 drop
It will examine claims by the then-prime minister in December 2021 that “all guidance was followed completely in No. 10” and “the guidance was followed and the rules were followed at all times”.
The committee will also look into “why he failed to tell the House about the gatherings at which he had been present”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel