THE UK Government has shown a "total disregard" for Parliament with its handling of Covid-19 regulations, according to the Speaker of the House of Commons.

Sir Lindsay Hoyle, making a statement to MPs ahead of Prime Minister’s Questions, announced he has not selected any amendments to a motion to extend emergency coronavirus powers to avoid "undermining the rule of law".

The Prime Minister was facing a rebellion from more than 50 Conservative backbench MPs who are angry that the Government has imposed rules without Parliament's scrutiny.

They were set to back an amendment from Sir Graham Brady, the influential chair of the 1922 Committee of backbench Tories, which would have handed Johnson a defeat with opposition support.

READ MORE: Boris Johnson refuses to rule out riding roughshod over devolved parliaments

But Hoyle said he was unable to select any amendments ahead of a vote on the renewal of the powers.

He explained: "The way in which the Government has exercised its power to make secondary legislation during this crisis has been totally unsatisfactory.

"All too often important statutory instruments have been published a matter of hours before they come into force and some explanations as to why important measures have come into effect before they can be laid before this house has been unconvincing and shows a total disregard for the House."

Hoyle said he would not select any amendments to the motion to renew the Covid-19 regulations to avoid "uncertainty" and possible legal challenges.

He added: "When I became Speaker I made it clear that I would take decisions on matters relating to procedures guided by professional advice.

"I have concluded on the basis of advice that I received that any amendment to the motion before the House risks giving rise to uncertainty about the decision the House has taken.

"This then risks decisions that are rightly the responsivity of Parliament ultimately being determined by the courts."

READ MORE: Scottish Tory MP boasts Internal Market Bill is 'rebalancing devolution'

The Speaker explained the lack of clarity risks undermining the rule of law.

He concluded: “I have therefore decided not to select any of the amendments to the motion.

"As I hope my early comments show I have not taken this decision lightly. I am looking to the Government to remedy a situation I regard as completely unsatisfactory.

"I am now looking to the Government to rebuild the trust with this House and not treat it with the contempt that it has shown."