WORLD-leading scientists have warned Theresa May not to allow Brexit to create new barriers to collaboration across Europe.
Dozens of winners of the Nobel Prize have written to the Prime Minister and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker setting out their concerns.
READ MORE: Restless Tory MPs prepare to take on Theresa May as leadership rumours intensify
Their message was echoed by the London-based Francis Crick Institute, which warned that a hard Brexit could cripple science across the continent.
Nobel winner and Crick director Sir Paul Nurse, one of the signatories to the letter, said scientists feared a hard Brexit would “seriously damage research”.
READ MORE: May insists extended Brexit implementation period would conclude ‘before 2020’
The letter to the Prime Minister, signed by 29 Nobel winners and six recipients of the Fields Medal awarded to outstanding mathematicians, said that “creating new barriers” to collaboration across the EU would “inhibit progress, to the detriment of us all”.
“Many of us in the science community therefore regret the UK’s decision to leave the European Union because it risks such barriers,” the group said.
They urged both sides in the Brexit negotiations to ensure “as little harm as possible is done to research”.
The letter’s signatories include biologist Venki Ramakrishnan, president of the Royal Society.
Meanwhile, a survey of more than 1000 staff at the Crick found 97% of them believed a hard Brexit would be bad for UK science and 82% thought it would have a detrimental effect on European science. The Crick is the biggest biomedical research lab under one roof in Europe and has been publicly praised by May, who toured the facility with Indian counterpart Narendra Modi in April.
Nurse said: “This survey reveals the depth of feeling amongst scientists that a hard Brexit will seriously damage research, and that the UK Government is not paying enough attention to science in the Brexit negotiations. Science and research matter for economic growth, health and quality of life.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here