CHINESE officials have defended the mass internment of Uighur and Kazakh Muslims by claiming it is saving ethnic minority groups from the lure of religious extremism.
Shohrat Zakir, the governor of the far-west Xinjiang region, described the internment as “free vocational training” which also provided people with skills to work in factories by teaching them to speak Mandarin and accept modern science.
Xinjiang, the north-western region where most Uighurs live, has been enveloped in recent years in police surveillance that authorities insist is required to combat extremism.
The report carried in official news outlets was a rare public move by a senior Chinese official to detail the goals of the Communist Party’s extrajudicial detention of an estimated one million ethnic minority Muslims.
The party’s vision entails Central Asian ethnic groups undergoing intensive assimilation in Chinese language and culture, and push them to adopt what the party considers a modern, civilised way of life.
The region’s Turkic-speaking Uighurs have long resented restrictions placed on their religious practices and complained of meeting widespread discrimination in jobs and access to passports.
Details in Zakir’s depiction of the centres are contradicted by accounts of former detainees. They have described being held in camps where they were forced to recite party slogans and renounce their faith.
Omir Bekali, a Xinjiang-born Kazakh citizen, said he was kept in a cell with 40 people inside a heavily-guarded facility.
Before meals, they were told to chant: “Thank the Party! Thank the Motherland!” During daily mandatory classes, they were told that their people were backward before being “liberated” by the party in the 1950s. Zakir said that “trainees” were put on the path toward a “modern life” and made “confident about the future”.
China has increased propaganda efforts to defend its measures in Xinjiang following growing criticism from human rights groups and western countries. Last month, UN human rights chief, Michelle Bachelet, said that monitors should be allowed into the region.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here