THE identities of the two women accusing Alex Salmond of sexual misconduct must be kept confidential, a judge ruled yesterday.
The former First Minister went to court to secure the anonymity orders.
Salmond’s judicial review is contesting the Scottish Government complaints process activated against him in relation to sexual harassment allegations made in January, which he strongly denies.
Lord Pentland granted the interim orders, preventing the publication of any material which would identify the women.
The Scottish Government did not object to Salmond’s action in court yesterday.
Speaking at the Court of Session, the judge said: “All those involved have been understandably concerned to protect the complainers’ privacy. The complaints were made in the expectation that the complainers’ privacy would be protected throughout.”
Ronald Clancy QC, representing Salmond, said: “The complainers made their original complaints with the legitimate expectation the matter would be dealt with in strict confidence.
“There is obvious public interest in the application of this 2017 procedure to him as a former minister and there is very significant public interest in the fairness of the procedure generally.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel