THERE are many similarities between the independence movements in Scotland and Catalonia – struggles from the 18th century as key moments in their campaign; both have had their language, culture and history suppressed in a bid to mould the countries they are now; both saw a surge in support in the 1960s and 1970s; and both attract widespread support for their cause.
One major difference is that between 1936 and 1939, Spain endured a bloody civil war when the nationalists backed by Germany and Italy fought the Russia-backed republicans, with German and Italian air forces launching bombing raids from Majorca on the civilian population.
When the civil war ended, the 35-year dictatorship of General Franco started. But the desire for a republic of Catalonia never died and still burns deep in the souls of many of its people.
Following the referendum last October 1, the Parliament of Catalonia declared independence from Spain. In response the then Spanish prime minister, Mariano Rajoy, dissolved the parliament and called a general election, which backfired when a pro-independence majority was returned.
Under threat of arrest, many members of the previous executive are living in exile, others have been arrested, as have civic and cultural leaders. Nobody has yet been put on trial, which has created a tense stand-off between Catalonia and Madrid.
Raul Romeva, former Catalan foreign affairs minister, told me dialogue was not possible on an even footing when he has to conduct his half of the conversation from jail. He believes dialogue and negotiations are the path to the successful establishment of an independent Catalonia – difficult when hundreds of politicians, civic and cultural leaders have the threat of imprisonment hanging over their heads.
An interesting development is that Rajoy’s replacement – prime minister Pedro Sànchez – has said he wants to improve the region’s existing self-government and his deputy has suggested the legalistic approach to the Catalan issue would now make way for political engagement.
Which brings us back to the political prisoners.
Jordi Sànchez, former president of the Catalan National Assembly, told me from his prison cell that the Supreme Court was contaminated and most of its judges were using political prisoners as hostages. If this is true, then it is hard to see how anyone can enter into negotiations where the agreed outcomes can be trusted.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here