LAST week in discussion with a middle-aged Scottish couple they said that they did not vote Yes in the 2014 referendum because they did not know what it would entail. The same applies today in 2018.
With a mortgage, children and grandchildren they wanted some positive picture of what they were being asked to vote for. There was/is no clear picture of what an independent Scotland would be like. No positive proposals of what policies Scotland would legislate for.
The couple are proud of being Scots, have travelled extensively and worked for many years in Germany, and are scathing about the essentially “feudal” style of government in Scotland and the UK.
They asked if independence for Scotland would mean a move towards being a democracy as is understood outside the UK, and if so, why has that not been drafted out in a provisional constitution? The couple are moving to a village in Germany where there is a local community bank and a fully funded village council responsible for a range of local services.
They mentioned the unwieldy system of 32 local authorities as set up by the Scottish Office in Westminster to provide remote control from London, replacing the previous county and burgh councils that had more effective local say.
After ten years in power the current SNP government have made no attempt to use the powers they possess to redress this situation.
The SNP government have done a lot of good work but on the issue of independence they appear to shy away at every turn providing no positive leadership.
The SNP promised to replace the council tax with a fairer system, but apart from a minor tweak nothing has been done. Always the mantra “wait until after independence” – what happens then?
READ MORE: New pro-independence campaign group to launch on St Andrew's Day
During the last independence referendum campaign during the debacle about a currency union, the then First Minister was provided with a viable alternative Plan B following a CBI meeting in Aberdeen. He chose to ignore the proposed alternative Plan B that was based on our own Scots currency and we suffered the consequences.
Brexit. We speak about the arrogance and the lack of forward-planning by the Westminster government, but is the SNP government also sharing the same disease of arrogance and lack of engagement with their own members and other independence-minded groups? These groups have researched and generated viable proposals for such as a written constitution, a government-controlled Scottish currency, a national central bank, monetary and fiscal policies.
The SNP leadership appears to concentrate on short-term issues and ignore long-term planning. Long-term planning that will be required in an independent Scotland regardless of the Brexit outcome. You don’t build a house until the plans are in place, however tentative they might be.
Where are the draft outline policies for health, education, care and welfare, pensions, immigration, business investment, air, rail and road transport, housing, agriculture, fishing, trade, defence, workers’ rights, minimum wage, and so many others?
The SNP are reputed to have one of the largest memberships of any UK party, so why are their skills not being utilised to draft out outline policies? It will take years of planning to adequately prepare all the relevant policies.
Why don’t the SNP build a policy portfolio by assigning the drafting of specific policies to different grassroots groups/areas then affirm the outcome at conference?
So back to the original question: “What will independence actually give us?”
Robert Ingram
Administrator, Centre for Scottish Constitutional Studies
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel