THE SNP’s fundamental objective is Scottish independence and the party’s membership soared after the 2014 referendum defeat with an army of activists committed and determined to bring that goal about.
Many of the 100,000 or so new members who joined four years ago did not expect a new vote on the issue in the short or perhaps even the medium term.
However, their hopes of a fresh plebiscite intensified after the SNP made a manifesto commitment at the Holyrood 2016 elections to call a new vote if Scotland voted to Remain in the EU and the UK as a whole voted to Leave.
READ MORE: This is the most likely independence timetable
That event did happen, and now the country is six months away from ‘being pulled out of Europe against its will’, while so far anyway, there is little sign of a new independence referendum.
Against this constitutional shift, and with tens of thousands of people turning out over the past couple of months for pro-independence marches up and down the country, it will seem odd to many SNP members and supporters that the party of independence appears to be discussing anything but independence at its last annual conference before Scotland exits with the rest of the UK from the European Union.
According to the provisional agenda for the conference in October, debates on the floor of the conference are expected to take place on a range of important issues.
Subjects such as tourism, migration, the gender pay gap, sexual consent and mental health provision in schools have been put forward for debate, but will these satisfy the many party members who are desperate to talk about how to secure independence and the timing of a new plebiscite at such a key juncture in Scotland’s history?
One party member The National spoke to said she would be “devastated” if Nicola Sturgeon does not announce the timing for a second referendum either at or before the conference – or at the very least reveal some very concrete plans about how she intends to achieve the big goal.
She also expressed a feeling of “being let down” should the First Minister not make some fundamental progress on the key objective, while a second member said he would probably leave the SNP if indyref2 was not called. Members holding these views are unlikely to be alone, but others are content to go with Sturgeon’s more ‘wait and see approach’ when it comes to having more clarity on Brexit and are acutely aware that a referendum if called must be won.
READ MORE: Independence referendum not featured on SNP conference agenda
“I am hoping – and to be honest expecting – Nicola to fire the starting pistol on indyref2 as the grassroots are all up and ready to start campaigning,” a third party member told us. “I would be concerned if that doesn’t happen. The Brexit apocalypse is coming and once that happens I’m not sure how good a position we will be in, if Westminster turns round and says we don’t need a Scottish Parliament – what happens then?
"However, I trust Nicola’s judgement to reveal the plan when the time is right. The decision on when needs to be made by properly informed political leaders. What I would like to see happen, isn’t necessarily the best plan in terms of reaching our goal.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel