UK ministers are being urged to provide “more generous” assistance for Syrian refugees in England after researchers found those who had been resettled in Scotland were better supported and happier.
Experts from Glasgow University compared the treatment of Syrian refugees aged between 18 and 32 in Lebanon, Greece and the UK. But they also looked at the difference in support provided north and south of the Border as part of the project, called Building a New Life in Britain.
The research looked at the lives of 212 young Syrian refugees who have settled in England and 265 who have made Scotland there home.
READ MORE: Glasgow tells Katie Hopkins where to go after refugee tweet
It found: “In all, young Syrians who have settled in Scotland are much better supported compared to those in England. Some 72% of our respondents in Scotland reported that their accommodation rent is subsidised by the state, compared to only 46% in England. Along the same lines, state cash subsidies constituted the main source of income for 70% of young Syrians in Scotland, compared to 47% of those in England.”
This means those in Scotland have “far better living conditions”, with only 11% in shared accommodation, compared to 28% in England.
A lower level of state support in England pushes refugees there to find work faster, but the report said this left refugees exposed to “precarious employment conditions” and also impacted on them emotionally. While the report found young Syrians in England were more confident than their counterparts in Scotland, at 32% compared to 19%, it also said 14% were scared about their life in the UK, compared to 9% in Scotland. It continued: “Moreover, young Syrians appear to be much happier in Scotland than in England (49% against 30%).
“These emotions feed directly into young Syrians’ plans for their future in the UK, with 81% in Scotland intending to remain in the country, compared to 65% in England.”
The report recommended: “If the aim of refugee policy is to facilitate settlement, rather than forced self-reliance, then the support offered to refugees in Scotland should be emulated across the UK, to confront the inequalities of the current system.”
Glasgow University head of philosophy Dr Ben Colburn, one of the lead authors of the report, also said there was a “two-tier system” between those who came to the UK as part of a resettlement programme and those who arrived on their own and were seeking asylum.
READ MORE: Gig will raise funds for Scottish refugees and spread message of anti-racism
He said it was “clear that the two-tier system isn’t working as consistently as it should if the goal is to foster social cohesion, facilitate integration and empower Syrian refugees to rebuild their lives”. Coburn added: “Preliminary findings from the next stage in our project indicate possible ways forward, including a more generous scheme of support for refugees such as that offered in Scotland, imperfect though it is.”
The report found just 2% of Syrians coming to the UK had been unemployed when they left their homeland, with 38% studying and 45% in work.
It called on politicians to make people more aware of the reasons refugees flee their country and the contributions they are able and eager to make once they reach the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here