GAMERS get more satisfaction immersing themselves in the online world than from everyday life, according to a Glasgow-based researcher.
The “vivid and thrilling” alternatives found in playing games such as Fortnite were found to be more appealing, especially those designed to reward and motivated players.
It is estimated the number of those joining the online gaming community will grow to 2.7 billion by 2021,
according to studies.
Andrew Reid, a doctoral researcher of serious games at Glasgow Caledonian University, said: “In a world where terror haunts the streets of major cities, mental health problems are on the rise, and international relations have become worryingly strained, people are increasingly seeking escape in the vivid and thrilling experiences of online gaming worlds.
“Games like Fortnite provide gratification in a way that the real world is currently unable to satisfy.
“Self-determination theory opens the debate of video game ‘addiction’ more broadly to look at game-playing as something that can satisfy basic human desires.”
He also disputes claims video games are addictive, despite a World Health Organisation move to officially classify gaming addiction as a disorder.
Seven years in the making, the sudden rise of Fortnite, a survival game available across most console and mobile platforms – has found fans across the globe. In the past, similar concerns were raised about World of Warcraft – a multiplayer open-world role playing game in which users create a character avatar before fighting monsters and completing quests.
Reid has previously said people should be careful about using the word “addictive” when referring to video games, as it could potentially stigmatise gamers.
Reid added: “To do otherwise would be to stigmatise the medium as an evil to our society, despite a growing portfolio of video games and research that reinforce the positive characteristics of play and interactivity.
“Fortnite has been carefully created to deliver a truly engaging experience which is not only different for each player but also changes each time they play the game. It makes playing the game hard to stop, but this is different to labelling the game, and games in general, as addictive.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here