RUTH Davidson has come under fire for claiming the UK should become less London-centric less than a week after her MSPs backed the Brexit Bill and its controversial clause which would see a raft of devolved powers come under Westminster control.
The Scottish Conservative leader is to call for major institutions – such as the British Museum – to consider setting up elsewhere in Britain as well as for most fishing infrastructure to be moved to Scotland.
In a speech on the union at the Policy Exchange in London today she will urge the UK Government to “develop better practices” to recognise the reality of devolution and build relationships with Edinburgh.
But ahead of the address, the SNP MSP Ivan McKee said it was the Tory Government at Westminster that called the shots and Davidson exerted little influence.
“Ruth Davidson used to talk a lot about standing up for Scotland’s interests – but when push comes to shove, at every opportunity she has let her Westminster bosses call the shots,” he said.
He underlined that while Tory MSPs backed centralising more powers at Westminster, the SNP would be unveiling the economic opportunities independence offers when it publishes a key report.
“Just last week, the Tories were the only party in the Scottish Parliament who failed to stand up against the UK Government’s attempted power grab,” he said.
“And while the anti-independence politicians are reduced to arguing with each other about how to mitigate the immense economic damage that Brexit will cause, independence supporters are having a debate about the immense economic opportunities and hope that independence offers. The contrast could not be starker.”
Writing in the Financial Times, she said: “We ... need to spread the benefits of the union fairly and equally around the nation. The UK is still too London-centric.
“As befits one of the world’s great cities, the capital gobbles up talent, money and status.
“It is government’s job to ensure that more of this ends up in the other great British metropolitan areas in our regions and in our nations.
“The Conservative government in Westminster is already delivering on its manifesto promise to move Channel 4 out of London. But this should be just the start.
“More cultural institutions – like the British Museum – should set up second homes outside the capital. More government posts should be based in other parts of the UK. With Brexit, we have an opportunity to ensure the powers that return to these shores are based nearer the communities they serve.
“Most of the UK’s fish, for example, are caught in waters off Scotland. So I believe most of the UK’s fishing infrastructure should be based north of the border.”
Davidson insisted it was “not an anti-London argument”, pointing to the success of the 2012 Olympics in “allowing Britons to feel they had a stake in their country”.
“That should be our goal so people, including those who currently support independence in Scotland, feel the UK is theirs too,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel