THE UK Government has been urged to revisit its decision to remove onshore wind projects from a key renewables scheme.
UK Business Secretary Greg Clark was pressed to allow onshore wind projects to compete in future Contracts for Difference (CfD) auctions.
Green MSP Andy Wightman called for reassurances for the onshore wind industry when Clark appeared before Holyrood's Economy Committee.
He said: "One of the strengths of the Scottish economy is renewables and yet we have 7.5 GW of onshore wind capacity in the planning pipeline without a viable route to market because of the decision the government has made on excluding onshore wind from Contracts for Difference.
"Do you recognise that with onshore wind, from your own government's figures, being 50 per cent cheaper than nuclear, it's a well established technology and it also has multiplier effects, that this should be revisited particularly in the context of Scottish renewables?"
Wightman highlighted indications from UK Energy Minister Claire Perry that the exclusion of onshore wind from the auctions might be under reconsideration.
Last year it was announced projects on the Scottish islands would be allowed to compete in the next round of the contracts.
Clark said the policy to focus on offshore wind was a "strategic decision" that had been successful but the government was reviewing its energy policy.
But he added: "All along the coastline in Scotland and the rest of the UK you have industrial facilities that have been built because of that clear long term commitment.
"I wouldn't want to move away from what has been a very successful approach that has brought costs down, created jobs and given what the industry wanted which is a long term confidence.
"I wouldn't want to change that lightly."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel