Nicola Sturgeon has said UK foreign policy should be set by Parliament and not Donald Trump after the US, UK and France launched missile strikes against Syria.
Scotland's First Minister said the suspected use of chemical weapons in Douma last week was "sickening" but warned that the latest action risked "dangerous escalation".
Writing on Twitter, she said her first thoughts were with service personnel taking part in the strikes, which targeted infrastructure at three sites connected with the Syrian regime's chemical weapons programme.
READ MORE: Syrian airstrikes are a warning to Russia, says Theresa May
Sturgeon said: "Syria's use of chemical weapons is sickening – but the question that the PM has not answered is how this action, taken without parliamentary approval, will halt their use or bring long-term peace.
"Air strikes have not resolved situation in Syria so far – nothing I've heard persuades me they will do so now.
"An international strategy for peace must be pursued – not a course that risks dangerous escalation.
"UK foreign policy should be set by Parliament, not US President."
SNP defence spokesman Stewart McDonald said UK forces were engaged in "gesture bombing with no major international consensus and no long term plan to halt the use of chemical weapons or deliver peace".
READ MORE: Syria airstrikes: Hundreds gather in Damascus in defiance
He wrote on Twitter: "Most worrying is that she has acted at the behest of presidential tweets and sidelined Parliament.
"What does this new bombing campaign do to help move Syria towards peace? Nothing.
"Instead, it has the potential to dangerously complicate the war, making matters on the ground worse for the people that the strikes are supposed to help. There is no peace strategy.
"This is not a brave or strong decision by the Prime Minister."
Writing on Twitter, Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson said: "I support the targeted air strikes by the UK, US and France against the Syrian regime's chemical weapons facilities.
"As the head of Nato has stated this morning, the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable and those responsible must be held accountable."
The Church of Scotland expressed "deep concern" over the decision to launch air strikes.
READ MORE: Downing Street says legal case for Syria airstrikes has been met
Rev Dr Richard Frazer, convener of the Kirk's church and society council, said: "Our firm belief is that air strikes will not improve this situation, but will lead to further loss of lives, displacement, suffering and fear."
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard said: "Political avenues should be exhausted before such a serious step is ever taken, yet the Prime Minister has been rushed into legally, morally and democratically questionable air strikes at the behest of Donald Trump.
"Britain should be taking a lead role in negotiating an end to the Syrian conflict and halting the abhorrent use of chemical weapons, rather than putting more innocent civilians at risk, and British military personnel too."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel