The SNP have reacted furiously to a wealthy Tory's demand for an apology over a tweet made by one of their MSPs.
Scottish Conservative MSP Edward Mountain wrote to Gillian Martin, asking that she apologise for claims he proposed changes to key land management legislation in order to protect his own interests.
Martin has since deleted the tweet and apologised to Mountain via email.
But the episode left the SNP angry at what they saw as “one of Ruth Davidson’s privileged, wealthy elite attempting to bully and silence parliamentarians”.
Mountain described Martin's comments as a "completely unjustified insinuation".
The Forestry and Land Management Bill includes measures to extend the compulsory purchase of land for sustainable development.
However, Mountain has put forward an amendment which would remove these powers from the legislation.
According to his register of interests, he is a partner in Moray-based Delfur Farms Farming Partnership and a partner in and owner of 50% of Delfur Fishings.
In a tweet related to a newspaper story on his amendment to the bill, Ms Martin wrote: "Make no mistake there are MSPs in Holyrood who are there to protect their own interest. Yet another example."
Mountain said his concerns were "entirely over the quality of legislation".
In a letter to Martin seeking an apology, the Highlands and Islands MSP said Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing "could not justify or give reasons for" the additional powers.
He said: "The Scottish Government has been persistently vague about the purpose and rationale for the new powers.
"At stage one, the majority Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee was of the view that the Scottish Government had not provided sufficient justification for its proposed extension of compulsory purchase powers to cover sustainable development.
"Then, at stage two, we felt the Scottish Government still had not provided an adequate definition of 'sustainable development'."
Martin deleted the tweet and sent an email apologising to Mountain, telling him: "we do not have to agree on those arguments but I perhaps used language which displayed my disagreement in a way which has hurt you personally, and for that I apologise."
But an SNP spokesman was more bullish: "The SNP will not be intimidated by one of Ruth Davidson's privileged, wealthy elite attempting to bully and silence parliamentarians.
"The Tory benches at Holyrood are stashed full of part-time MSPs who have huge external earnings - some of whom have flagrantly abused their privileged position to try and advance their private financial and business interests.
"The SNP will continue to shine a light on that - and to ask the questions Tories like Edward Mountain would prefer were hushed up."
MSPs will debate and vote on final amendments to the bill at its third and last stage on Wednesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel