EMBATTLED Ukip leader Henry Bolton has compared the scrutiny of his private life to that faced by Diana, Princess of Wales.
Ukip members will decide his fate today at a crisis meeting after the party’s ruling national executive committee (NEC) backed a motion of no confidence in his leadership.
Bolton is clinging on to the leadership despite a revolt by several senior figures in the party in protest at his relationship with model Jo Marney. Bolton has admitted he still has “strong affections” for his former girlfriend who sent racist messages about Meghan Markle.
Bolton hit out at the media interest in his private life following the breakdown of his marriage to
Tatiana Smurova and his new relationship with Marney.
He said: “The only people that are truly affected by that are my wife and children, and I feel deeply, deeply sad for what pain and hurt I’ve caused them but it’s a private matter and it needs to be dealt with privately.
“I understand the scrutiny and public interest but it’s been going on for six weeks. There’s probably been nothing like that since the Profumo affair or Diana and Dodi [Fayed].”
He said: “The interesting thing about this whole case is that I myself have done nothing wrong. I have gone through a huge degree of scrutiny and a massive amount of personal disruption over the last six weeks.
“It’s been an experience I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy ... in hindsight I would have probably dealt with certain personal elements of it in a different way.”
Bolton’s future will be decided by hundreds of Ukip members gathered at an extraordinary general meeting in Birmingham which will decide whether or not to endorse the NEC’s no confidence vote.
The Ukip leader, who has called for sweeping changes to the way the party is run, claimed he was the victim of rivals “stirring the pot”.
“The people who started complaining about this were people on the NEC, none of whom voted for me in the leadership election.
“Secondly there were a small number of individuals within the party, failed leadership contenders who saw an opportunity in me leaving my wife to go in for the kill – they’re stirring the pot ... if they were truly dedicated to the party and their country and not to their own they would have stayed at their posts.”
The cash-strapped party is in crisis, with the prospect of a legal bill over a defamation action brought by Rotherham’s three Labour MPs against MEP Jane Collins.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here