The SNP's Chris McEleny has insisted that his Labour councillor rival is in fact a "dick" - after he was urged to apologise for calling him one.
McEleny, the leader of the opposition group on Inverclyde council, called Labour council leader Stephen McCabe a "dick" on Twitter.
McCabe said he hoped that McEleny would say sorry for the name calling, but said he was “not sure he has it in his character to apologise”.
The exchange took place after a public spat over the upcoming budget vote on the council.
McEleny claimed that the council had been provided with the SNP's alternative plan to what McCabe, the council leader, was setting out.
McCabe stated that McEleny “wants us to ignore the views of our residents and our staff and just get on and agree £ms of cuts…” at which point the SNP councillor asked “Do you go out of your way to come across as a dick at all times or is it natural?"
McCabe, affronted at the very thought of being called a dick, then spoke to The Herald newspaper and told them he was "very disappointed" such language was used.
Defending his position, McEleny stated that McCabe’s behaviour was the definition of being a dick.
He said: “I think the guy has sent me something like over 100 messages late at night over the past while on Twitter. It’s certainly the sort of behaviour that the colloquialism implied.
“However it’s really not an issue I’ll be giving any further thought to when I’m in the process of trying to set our councils budget for the coming year.
"If I was offering any advice to Stephen, he perhaps should be spending more time concentrating on that late at night instead of this weird obsession he has of contacting me to somehow relate everything that’s gone wrong in the world to the SNP and me.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel