HARDLINE unionist Ian Paisley resorted to the inflammatory language of the Troubles again today when he told ministers to take a "no surrender attitude to the EU bureaucrats".
The DUP MP, son of the late Rev Ian Paisley, accused European leaders of trying to blackmail and bully the UK as he asked a question.
The late Paisley senior, a former Stormont First Minister and DUP leader, regularly used the "No Surrender" phrase to whip up hardline anti-Catholic and Irish nationalist sentiments during the Troubles - and to direct anger against anyone he regarded as "betraying" Ulster unionists. The “No Surrender” call is still used today by Orange Order supporters in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Paisley Junior’s comments in the Commons today came as MPs pressed Northern Ireland ministers for more details about Brexit and how the Irish border issue will be addressed.
Northern Ireland Secretary Karen Bradley and minister Shailesh Vara reiterated the UK's commitment to maintain a frictionless border, without undermining the integrity of the UK.
North Antrim MP Paisley said: "Does the minister agree with me that it's about time the Government demonstrated a no surrender attitude to the EU bureaucrats, who try to blackmail us, bully us, over air flights, passenger duty and everything else.
"Stand up to them man, and stand up to the EU and let's get on with leaving the EU."
Vara replied: "The Prime Minister will stand up to anyone and everyone when it comes to maintaining the best interests of the United Kingdom."
There was further criticism of the EU and Irish ministers by DUP MPs during Northern Ireland questions.
Jim Shannon (Strangford) urged trading with Ireland to continue "unhindered by petty point scoring, statement making, headline grabbing whims of EU leadership".
Sammy Wilson (East Antrim) raised concerns about "the frictions in relationships between the UK Government and the Irish Republic".
He added: "What comment has he got to make about the threat issued by the foreign minister yesterday, that he will block negotiations if he does not get the legislation produced to force the Northern Ireland assembly to introduce EU regulations."
SNP spokeswoman Deidre Brock questioned if the UK leaving the customs union would mean a divergence of regulations between Ireland and Northern Ireland.
"Will she tell us what, and I quote, specific solutions to address the unique circumstances of the island of Ireland she is proposing," she added.
Bradley said: "There are unique circumstances in Northern Ireland, unique to anywhere across the whole of Europe, and those unique circumstances have to be reflected.
"The UK Government's intention is that we resolve the matter of north-south trade and east-west through the overall UK EU agreement.
"But we are absolutely determined to make sure that we respect the integrity of the north-south border and that we respect the agreements that were made in Belfast nearly 20 years ago."
Vara added: "Let's be absolutely clear. We have said that we will be leaving the customs union and we will be leaving the single market as well.
"What we hope to do is, in phase two, engage in those negotiations to make sure that we have the best possible trade deal that we possibly can have with the European Union, but we are committed to having a frictionless border."
Elsewhere, shadow Northern Ireland minister Stephen Pound asked whether an electronic border between the Republic and Northern Ireland was "feasible or is it just a fantasy".
Bradley said: "We are determined there will be no new physical infrastructure at the border and we will maintain things like the Common Travel Area, which has been in existence since well before the EU."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel