HONG Kong’s highest court has overturned prison sentences for three young pro-democracy activists convicted over their roles in 2014’s Umbrella Movement protests in the city.
A panel of judges sided with Joshua Wong, Nathan Law and Alex Chow in their appeal against prison terms for unlawful assembly.
The case sparked controversy because a magistrate initially gave the three lenient sentences, but the justice secretary requested a review that resulted in prison time ranging from six to eight months, raising concerns about judicial independence and rule of law.
The Court of Final Appeal’s ruling was an unexpected victory for the city’s youthful opposition movement after recent setbacks.
But the activists said they feared it would have a chilling effect on future protests because the five judges on the panel also said they endorsed the lower court’s view that a new, tougher sentencing approach was needed for unlawful assemblies.
“Hong Kong is on the whole a peaceful society and elements of disorder and violence must be deterred,” chief justice Geoffrey Ma said.
Wong, 21, said after the decision: “Maybe more and more activists will be locked up because of this harsh judgment.”
The three were convicted on unlawful assembly charges for their part in storming a courtyard at government headquarters in September 2014 in protest at Beijing’s plan to restrict elections.
Wong, Law, 24, and Chow, 27, had already served about two months of their sentences before they were bailed for their appeal.
The 2014 protests spawned a youthful opposition movement that gained political traction but also faced resistance from Hong Kong’s Beijing-backed government.
Law was elected to the semi-democratic legislature in 2016 but was disqualified after a government legal challenge. Wong also had plans to run for office but the prison sentence had barred him from office for five years.
Wong may still end up behind bars. He is also appealing against a three-month prison sentence for a separate contempt case.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here