THE suggestion, by his wife, that Chief Constable Phil Gormley’s current travails may be due to his being English seems imprudent and unhelpful, but as The Thunderer of London has editorialised that it “deserves to be explored”, so be it (Chief Constable’s wife attacks probe. The National, January 20).
The Scots have, for a century and more, been remarkably restrained while a hugely disproportionate number of “top jobs” have seemingly been reserved for, or gifted to, English incomers. If the elephant in the room is now to squash open that can of worms, we should tread carefully but not be afraid to be honest.
Much of that phenomenon has, of course, been inevitable, and often no doubt entirely fair, when we were – still are – in an unequal Union with a country ten times our size and with a hundred times an opinion of themselves. Which is not surprising as, until relatively recently, they ruled half the planet. Nevertheless, it is extremely unlikely that the Scots – historically thought of (and not just by ourselves) as well-educated and hard-working, really are not fit to take the leadership roles in the civil, cultural and educational etc fields in their own country.
Happily, things may be improving. The top positions seem to be going less often to “carpetbaggers” – to be fair, the Scots dumped their bags, on merit, all over the old Empire! – but it will be unacceptable if the bourach that London is making of Brexit results in another flood of refugees from the Green and Pleasant being gifted the strings and levers of power in Scotland again. Those days are surely gone now.
David Roche
Address supplied
SCOTLAND is a cosmopolitan place and the people in authority here reflect this. Having a chief constable and two out three deputies from a neighbouring country is disproportionate.
While it is good to welcome people into our midst from elsewhere, it is wrong to get to the point where local people are always in the minority in positions of power.
Mr Gormley, having secured the top job, continues to have his home in England. This does not inspire confidence in his commitment to Scotland and the likelihood of him becoming a permanent resident.
Margaret Pennycook
Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel