FOOTBALL shirt advertising by betting companies has risen "dramatically" since legislation was relaxed, new research from the University of Glasgow has found.
Researchers found that 95 per cent (75/79) of football shirt sponsorship deals with English clubs included in the study were struck since the 2005 legislation was passed.
Before 2005, they could only find four shirt sponsorship deals between English clubs and gambling companies in their dataset.
The researchers, who worked alongside Healthy Stadia, warned that gambling is a public health issue with potential for harm and called on UK legislators and governing bodies of sport to urgently revisit the relationship between football and gambling industry sponsorship.
Dr Chris Bunn, of the institute of health and wellbeing at the University of Glasgow, said: "The number of gambling firms sponsoring the shirts of major football clubs has increased dramatically since legislation was relaxed in 2005."
He added: "The intensification of the relationship between football and gambling advertising is highly likely to contribute to the normalisation of gambling, or what some have called the 'gamblification' of sports.
"We should be concerned and circumspect about this trend, given the consequence and cost disordered gambling can have for individuals, families and society writ large.
"When sponsorship crosses borders, as in the case of the Premier League which has as many as three billion viewers globally, it can have costs and consequences for societies less equipped than ours to assist those whose gambling becomes problematic."
The Glasgow academics analysed shirt sponsorship since the English Premier League's inaugural season of 1992/1993 to present day, and since the start of the Scottish Premier League in 1998/99 – which was rebranded as the Scottish Premiership in 2013.
The first gambling sponsor appeared on an English Premier League club shirt in 2002/03 and in the 2014/15 season in Scotland's Premiership.
By the 2016/17 season, 50 per cent of the 20 EPL members carried gambling sponsorship on their shirts.
In contrast to this, only two out of 12 current members of Scotland's premier league had gambling sponsors on their shirts in 2016/17.
Researchers noted the Premier League in Scotland receives less global attention and less income from selling its TV rights than the EPL.
Although there is not as much shirt sponsorship in the Scottish top flight as in the EPL, researchers found less difference in other areas.
Gambling companies sponsor the top four leagues in Scotland and the League Cup, they said.
In England, they found the same is true of all three tiers of the English Football League from Championship down to League Two, but not in the English Premier League, which has refrained from selling name rights to the league since 2016.
Robin Ireland, director of research at Healthy Stadia, said: "We need to be clear that gambling is a public health issue with a significant burden of harm associated with it."
He added: "We suggest that the relationship between football and gambling is now very unhealthy.
"Both legislators and governing bodies of sport should revisit the relationship between football in the UK and the sponsorship it receives from the gambling industry with a view to responsible codes of practice."
The research suggests that gambling companies responded to the relaxation of the gambling legislation in the UK by investing heavily in shirt sponsorship.
The findings are published in the Journal, Soccer & Society.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here