UK Environment Secretary Michael Gove has left "too many questions unanswered" about the impact of Brexit on farming subsidies, his Holyrood counterpart has claimed.
While Gove said the UK Government will maintain current farming subsidies for five years, Fergus Ewing, Scottish Rural Economy Secretary, said he had been seeking assurances on the key issue for 18 months.
Although he welcomed the guarantee that basic Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) payments will continue for that period, he claimed that Gove's speech addressing the issue "leaves far too many questions unanswered for any comfort to be taken".
The minister hit out after Gove used his address to the Oxford Farming Conference to set out plans for food and farming after Brexit, including a switch away from the ''unjust and inefficient'' subsidies paid through the EU.
Gove outlined how he wants to see taxpayers' money going in future years to environmental protection, increasing public access to the countryside, and on technology, skills, infrastructure, and supporting rural communities.
The UK currently benefits from about £3 billion a year in farm subsidies, with Gove saying he envisaged farm payments continuing for five years from 2019.
But during that time he aims to curb the largest subsidies, with a maximum cap or a sliding scale of reductions.
And in the future, taxpayers' money would only go on paying for public goods that the market does not provide.
Ewing said: "The guarantee of the continuation of CAP basic payments for five years after Brexit is welcome - something that I have sought since the referendum and, importantly, something that we were promised by Brexit campaigners."
But he added: "While this guarantee provides a degree of certainty and clarity, it does not cover a whole variety of vital support schemes such as for our hill farmers, sheep and beef support, new entrants, and forestry and environmental support programmes, which are crucial to ensure the continued economic well-being of all of Scotland's rural communities "I have continually highlighted to Gove the fact that without support for our hill farmers - under the LFASS scheme continuing in Scotland - many of them would give up farming and the impacts on rural Scotland would be devastating.
"So while the guarantees issued today are welcome, having been sought by me for nearly a year-and-a-half - it leaves far too many questions unanswered for any comfort to be taken."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here