SOUTH Korea has offered high-level talks with rival North Korea to find ways to co-operate on next month’s Winter Olympics in the South.
Seoul’s quick proposal after a rare rapprochement overture from Pyongyang a day earlier offers the possibility of better ties after a year which saw a nuclear stand-off increase fear of war on the Korean Peninsula.
In a closely watched New Year address, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said on Monday he is willing to send a delegation to the Olympics, though he also repeated nuclear threats against the United States.
Analysts said Kim may be trying to drive a wedge between Seoul and its ally, Washington, as a way to ease international isolation and sanctions against North Korea.
Kim’s overture was welcome news for the South Korean government led by liberal President Moon Jae-in, who favours dialogue to ease the North’s nuclear threats and wants to use the Olympics as a chance to improve inter-Korean ties.
Moon’s unification minister, Cho Myoung-gyon, proposed in a nationally televised news conference that the two Koreas meet on January 9 in the shared border village of Panmunjom to discuss Olympic co-operation and how to improve overall ties.
Moon also spoke of Kim’s positive response to earlier South Korean dialogue overtures and ordered officials to study how to restore talks with North Korea and get the North to participate in the Olympics.
North Korea did not immediately respond. But if there are talks, they would be the first formal dialogue between the Koreas since December 2015.
Relations between the two countries have plunged as North Korea under Kim expanded its weapons programmes amid a hard-line stance by Moon’s conservative predecessors.
Last year, North Korea carried out its sixth and most powerful nuclear test and test-launched three intercontinental ballistic missiles as part of its push to possess a nuclear missile capable of reaching anywhere in the United States.
The North was subsequently hit with toughened UN sanctions, and Kim and US President Donald Trump exchanged warlike rhetoric and crude personal insults against each other.
Possible inter-Korean talks could provide a temporary thaw in relations, but could also weaken US-led international pressure on the North.
After the Olympics, inter-Korean ties could become frosty again, with North Korea making it clear that it has no intention of accepting international calls for nuclear disarmament and instead wants to bolster its weapons arsenal in the face of what it calls increasing US threats.
In his address on Monday, Kim said the United States should be aware that his country’s nuclear forces are now a reality, not a threat. He said he has a “nuclear button” on his office desk, warning that “the whole territory of the US is within the range of our nuclear strike”.
He called for improved ties and a relaxation of military tensions with South Korea, saying the Winter Olympics could showcase the status of the Korean nation.
But Kim still said South Korea must stop annual military exercises with the United States, which he calls an invasion rehearsal against the North.
The New Year address is an annual event in North Korea and is watched closely for indications of the direction and priorities Kim may adopt in the year ahead.
Kim has made similar comments offering hope for closer ties with South Korea in previous New Year’s addresses, but these have failed to take shape.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here