SNP MPs must "show some backbone" and back an amendment to the Government's Brexit Bill that would allow for a second referendum to be held, LibDem leader Vince Cable has said.
He made the plea after Labour, SNP and LibDem MPs in the House of Commons united with rebel Conservatives to inflict defeat on Prime Minister Theresa May in a key vote on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
An amendment to ensure MPs have a "meaningful vote" on the final deal was passed by four votes earlier this week.
In light of that, Cable urged SNP MPs to back the LibDem amendment to the Bill which would provide for a referendum on the exit deal once it is agreed, giving the public the chance to vote for the UK to remain in the EU if they do not like the final agreement.
The LibDem leader said: "There is growing evidence that the British public wants a say on any final deal with the EU, including the option of an exit from Brexit.
"Moreover, the Scottish people voted to remain in the EU, so their elected representatives in Parliament really must push for a popular vote.
"Which is why the SNP's Westminster party must show some backbone and support our amendment.
"Nicola Sturgeon herself has said a public vote would be 'irresistible' in the event of a 'no deal' Brexit that would see the UK crash out of the EU and that the people have a 'right to look at the outcome' if there is a deal.
"But she must go further and back the Liberal Democrat call for a referendum on any Brexit deal.
"The Conservatives have botched Brexit so far and the last thing the SNP should be doing is allowing the Conservative right to secure an economically damaging hard Brexit."
An SNP spokesman said: ''The most detail people had in the Brexit referendum was a lie plastered across the side of a bus – and 18 months on we still don't have any detail.
"We could end up crashing out with no deal, or with a very bad deal, and, in those circumstances, for the UK Government simply to say to people they have to accept the outcome no matter how bad it is, may become very difficult for them to sustain."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel