FURTHER work on the Queensferry Crossing will done in a way that "minimises inconvenience" to the public, the First Minister has said.
The £1.35 billion bridge will be partially closed for surfacing work from Thursday to Wednesday.
Transport officials said more lane restrictions could be expected on the crossing over the next 10 months due to ''snagging'' issues.
Nicola Sturgeon said the work beginning on Thursday was "the only identified work" requiring peak-time lane closures.
She sought to give reassurances during First Minister's Questions at Holyrood as opposition leaders accused the Scottish Government of "pushing through" the bridge's opening in September and failing to be upfront with the public.
She said: "Yes there will be further snagging works required over the coming months, again entirely normal on an infrastructure project.
"The work that will start tonight is the only identified snagging work that will require peak-time lane closures. Any future lane closures that can't be avoided will be at night, not during the day, and not during peak hours.
"Under the contract all snagging works are carried out at no additional cost to the Scottish Government."
Work is scheduled to begin at 10pm on Thursday and finish by 6am on Wednesday December 6.
During that time, southbound traffic heading towards Edinburgh will use the Forth Road Bridge, while northbound traffic will use the Queensferry Crossing.
Transport Scotland told a Holyrood committee that issues with road surfacing were known about in August - before the crossing's opening - but a solution was not found until a ''couple of weeks'' ago.
Sturgeon said: "When the solution to this particular piece of work was agreed ministers were told - that happened on Tuesday of last week.
"As soon as there was then confirmation from the Met Office about the weather window - that happened on Monday this week - Parliament and the wider public were informed.
"In other words, there was no delay, things happened completely timeously."
Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson accused the government of "dripping out information" on the bridge works.
She said: "Transport Scotland knew that the road over the bridge was faulty when the bridge was opened back in August, because that's what they said in Parliament yesterday, yet the Transport Minister said this morning that he knew nothing about the partial closure until last week.
"What jars here is the way that they pushed through the opening of this bridge in the summer and claimed it as a symbol of SNP competence, but now there's a problem it's 'don't look at us we're just the Scottish Government'.
"In September it was jobs done and pats on the back all round, but on Monday we were told there would be another five days of work needed and yesterday those five days became another 10 months of possible disruption.
"It's the dripping out of this information rather than simply levelling with people that's damaging the public's trust."
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie said: "Who spends over a billion pounds on a bridge then closes it weeks later?
He added: "With work predicted to last until September next year the completion of this crossing will be two years late. People deserve openness at last from this government.
"This government's priority has been to not disrupt the ceremony with troublesome facts."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel