UNISON and Neil Findlay MSP will present a petition to global retailer Schuh calling for transparency in its supply chain and action to improve shoe workers’ rights.
Labour MSP Neil Findlay will join Unison activists at the company head office in Livingston to hand over the petition, and provide Schuh with case studies of exploited workers in shoe factories in India and Bangladesh.
The Labour Behind the Label campaign, supported by Unison Scotland, aims to raise awareness of the exploitation of garment workers producing goods sold on our high streets.
Unison is demanding that the global footwear company show they are willing to be held publicly accountable for conditions of workers in their supply chain. Making lists of suppliers public and taking immediate action to make working conditions safer for some of the world’s most vulnerable workers would be a positive step.
Simon Macfarlane, Unison regional organiser, said: “People across the world are waking up to the links between the shoes and clothes they buy and the exploitation of workers by well-known brands. More than 13,000 global citizens have signed a petition calling on Schuh and other retailers to act to ensure garment workers are not endangered.”
Neil Findlay, who represents the Lothians, said: “We all want Schuh to provide fair pay and good working conditions for workers in Livingston but this should also apply to those across the world who make the products they sell.”
We would like Schuh, a Livingston-based company, to demonstrate they are industry leaders by standing up for the rights of working people involved throughout the manufacture of the shoes they sell. They can do this by requiring that companies in their extensive supply chain meet decent labour standards and by actively monitoring suppliers to ensure compliance.
“Working conditions in the garment industry are often hidden from us because most brands keep their supply chains secret. This needs to change. We all want Schuh to provide fair pay and good working conditions for workers in Livingston but this should also apply to those across the world who make the products they sell.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here