THE sudden death of a gifted Scottish soldier during an Army fitness test was an “unforeseen tragedy” stemming from an underlying medical condition, an official report has concluded.
Corporal Josh Hoole, 26, of The Rifles, died in July last year in Brecon, Mid Wales, after collapsing while on pre-course training for the platoon sergeants’ battle course.
A probe concluded the cause of his death was “within the definition of sudden arrhythmogenic death syndrome (SADS)” – a condition that affects the heart.
A panel found Hoole, from Ecclefechan, near Lockerbie in Dumfries and Galloway, would not have known of his susceptibility to SADS and that it was reasonable for the Army not to have known about the problem.
It made a number of recommendations for the future, but stressed none of the areas examined directly contributed to, or aggravated, the soldier’s death.
Hoole had been due to marry his fiancee this year.
He was taking part in a training session as part of a course that was described as “both mentally and physically demanding”.
Hoole collapsed at around 6.30am on July 19, 2016. Temperatures later that day peaked at just above 30°C (86°F).
A Ministry of Defence service inquiry (SI) into the death was carried out by the Defence Safety Authority and the findings have now made available.
The report has not revealed the exact cause of death but found it was “within the definition of SADS”.
It found a combination of SADS trigger factors – exercise, heat, adrenaline levels and potentially an imbalance of blood salt levels – were “contributory to this accident” but concluded: “The SI found no aggravating factors in this accident.”
Writing in the report, Lieutenant General Richard Felton said: “Cpl Hoole was a physically fit, determined and capable infantry soldier.
“He was experienced, with numerous operational deployments under his belt in his eight years of service, and had a promising career ahead of him. His sudden death ... was an unforeseen tragedy.”
The panel concluded the soldier did not die as a direct result of doing the annual fitness test (AFT). “Cpl Hoole’s medical condition might have manifested itself similarly at any time if what he was doing caused the trigger factors to prompt SADS,” the report stated.
“Furthermore, despite the immed- iate and comprehensive emergency medical treatment Cpl Hoole received, it was not realistically possible to have saved his life once he had collapsed. The SI found that it was reasonable for the Army not to have known about Cpl Hoole’s medical condition.”
The panel said they believed Hoole did not know about his susceptibility to SADS and he had been passed as medically fit to attend the course only eight days earlier.
It made a number of recommend- ations to address inconsistencies and shortfalls across the areas it examined, but said: “It must be stressed that none of these were factors that directly contributed to, or aggravated Cpl Hoole’s death.”
Felton concluded: “Although doing the AFT did not directly cause Cpl Hoole’s death, the loss of such a gifted and promising soldier was an unexpected tragedy.
“On behalf of the Defence Safety Authority, I offer my condolences to his family, friends and loved ones.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here