THE prime minister of Iraq has issued a 24-hour suspension of the movement of troops deployed to bring territory held by Kurdish forces in the north of the country back under federal control.
The order was given to “prevent clashes and bloodshed between the sons of one nation”, Haider al-Abadi said in a written statement.
The announcement follows conflicting reports from the US-led coalition that a ceasefire had been reached between Kurdish forces and troops deployed by Iraq’s central government.
After initially announcing a ceasefire, the coalition said the statement was incorrect, but added talks were continuing.
Escalating tensions between Irbil and Baghdad erupted in violence earlier this month following a controversial referendum on independence held by the Kurds in September.
Clashes broke out when federal forces retook the disputed city of Kirkuk and other areas outside the autonomous Kurdish region that the Kurds had seized from Daesh.
Most of the Kurdish forces withdrew without a fight after Iraqi troops moved in, but reports of low-level clashes continued and tensions remained.
The Kurdish referendum was held in the three provinces that make up the Kurds’ autonomous zone, as well as in a string of territories claimed by Baghdad, but at the time controlled by Kurdish forces.
Al-Abadi demanded the annulment of the vote and the transfer of border control and other infrastructure to federal forces.
Kurdish officials offered this week to “freeze” the results of the vote, but al-Abadi rejected the offer on Thursday.
Also on Thursday, Iraq announced an offensive to retake the last major pocket of Daesh-held territory, on the western edge of the sprawling Anbar province.
Al-Abadi said in a statement that the operation aims to liberate the towns of Qaim and Rawa, adding that the militants must choose “death or surrender”.
Coalition officials have warned that tensions between Baghdad and Irbil are “distracting” from the fight against Daesh.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here