MORE than 60 civilians whose bodies were found in a Syrian town taken back by government troops from Daesh militants were killed in a “shocking massacre”.
Talal Barazi, the governor of Homs province, where the discovery was made, said the search and documentation of those killed in the town of Qaryatayn is still under way.
Barazi said most of the bodies were of townspeople who were government employees or were affiliated with Syria’s ruling Baath party. He said at least 13 residents remain missing, while six bodies have not been identified.
He said the killings took place during the three weeks that Daesh was present in the town, “terrorising” its residents.
Government forces regained control of Qaryatayn on Saturday.
News of the discovery of at least 67 bodies began to emerge on Sunday. The death toll is likely to climb.
Some were shot in the street as Daesh militants retreated from the town, because they were suspected of working with the governments, according to activists. At least 35 of the casualties were found shot and their bodies dumped in a shaft.
The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said it had documented the killings of at least 128 people in Qaryatayn during the last days of Daesh control of the town.
The head of the observatory, Rami Abdurrahman, said what happened in the town was a “massacre”.
The activist-run group said other bodies were also found in the town streets – apparently people who had been shot by pro-government forces and suspected of working with Daesh. The observatory also said it documented at least 12 killed at the hands of pro-government troops after they regained control of the town.
Daesh militants first seized Qaryatayn in August 2015, and relied on the strategically located town to defend another of their bastions, the historic city of Palmyra. At the time, thousands of Christian residents fled, fearing the extremist group’s brutality.
With Russian backing, Syrian troops regained control of the town in April 2016. But Daesh, facing major setbacks around Syria and Iraq, launched a new attack on the town in late September and recaptured it.
At the time, Russia accused the US, which is battling Daesh, of looking the other way and allowing the militants to attack Qaryatayn.
Most of the Daesh militants who were involved in attacks on the town were local residents.
Pro-government media blamed the loss of Qaryatayn for the second time on what it described as militant “sleeper cells”.
There was no immediate comment from the government in Damascus on the discovery of the bodies in Qaryatayn.
The apparent revenge killings underscore Daesh’s ability to inflict heavy losses in Syria even while its militants are on the retreat in north and eastern Syria, days after having been defeated in Raqqa, the group’s de facto capital.
The deaths also raise the spectre of more revenge killings by the group while it fights to hang on to its last Syrian strongholds.
Video footage shot as Syrian government troops recaptured Qaryatayn showed several bodies in the streets. In the video, a resident says Daesh “monsters” killed more than a 100 people, including soldiers and civilians.
“These are people who don’t know God, they don’t know anything,” he said.
“They killed children and women with knives, they beat women, broke their arms.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here