Last night on STV’s debate between the two candidates fighting each other to be the next leader of Scottish Labour, Anas Sarwar proudly claimed, that as an MSP, he was a “living wage” employer.
Yet it was reported today that the millionaire only registered as an accredited Living Wage employer after entering the leadership race.
Though that doesn’t mean Sarwar has ever paid his parliamentary employees less than the living wage, the fact that it took him over a year from being elected to registering was jumped on by opponents.
The millionaire has come under pressure over pay rates at family firm, United Wholesale (Scotland) Ltd. Jobs were being advertising at around £1 an hour less than the living wage of £8.45 promoted by Scottish Labour.
Sarwar’s left-wing rival Richard Leonard registered as a living wage employer in late 2016.
SNP MP James Dornan said: “It’s good to see Anas Sarwar finally join the long list of living-wage accredited MSPs.
“But his hypocrisy has been exposed, and it would have been welcome if he’d embraced the real living wage early for his family firm.”
A spokesman for Leonard added: “Richard pays his staff at least the real living wage and has done so since they were employed.”
A spokesman for Sarwar said: “Anas pays all his employees more than the real living wage and has done so since being elected in 2016. He believes it should be mandatory for all employers and wants further radical policies such as a Scottish Child Tax Credit to lift 50,000 children out of poverty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here