THE Tory MP for Borders constituency Berwick, Roxburgh and Selkirk has defended his expenses claim while working as an MSP – after receiving much higher sums than SNP counterparts.
John Lamont, who resigned as a Tory MSP in April to fight the UK General Election, said he was a “very active MSP” and all his expenses had been approved as legitimate.
Over the last five years, Lamont claimed £168,844 in total, while Christine Grahame, the SNP MSP for Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale, claimed £98,830 and Paul Wheelhouse, a regional MSP for South Scotland, claimed £85,962.
Lamont’s successor at Holyrood, Tory Rachael Hamilton, claimed almost £14,000 in 10 months.
Lamont was first elected as an MSP in 2007 then became an MP in June after beating the SNP’s Calum Kerr.
In his last full year at Holyrood, he claimed total allowances of £34,217 while Grahame claimed £19,249 and Wheelhouse £16,169.
Lamont’s total is made up of 436 separate claims. Of these, 224 were for travel costing £6845; 35 were for stays in Edinburgh hotels at a total cost of £4111; 108 were for office provision, totalling £17,775; 16 were for surgery advertising at £2489; 37 for staff travel at £1627 and 14 for telecommunications at £1337.
Grahame’s expenses for the year consisted of 176 separate claims – 75 for office provision costing £16,458; 75 for travel at £972; nine for staff travel at £220; three for surgery advertising at £813 and 10 for telecommunications at £688.
Wheelhouse, the SNP Government’s Business, Innovation and Energy Minister, submitted 96 claims of which 30 were for accommodation in Edinburgh at £5933; 12 for travel at £375, 40 for office provision at £9246 and 13 for telecommunications at £555.
Lamont said: “All these expenses claims are for approved Parliamentary activity.
“I was a very active MSP and as a member of parliament I intend to continue to hold advice surgeries, meet with local businesses and organisations and help out as many constituents as possible.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel