HEAD of women’s football Baroness Sue Campbell has given her backing to Football Association chief executive Martin Glenn over the sacking of Mark Sampson.
Sampson’s contract as England Women’s manager was terminated on Wednesday based on evidence of “inappropriate and unacceptable” behaviour in a previous role in a safeguarding report.
Glenn and FA chairman Greg Clarke are under fierce scrutiny over why it took so long to sack the 34-year-old in relation to allegations which were first reported to the FA in 2014.
FA executives will appear before the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee next month to face questions about the matter. But Campbell insists Glenn, appointed chief executive in March 2015, should not lose his job.
She told BBC Radio 5 Live: “We at the FA have lessons to learn but I believe Martin is doing an amazing job turning round a super tanker.
“He is an outstanding chief executive and he has handled this with complete integrity in terms of the process.
“This has not been comfortable for anybody, we need to respect there is some human pain in all this for everybody. It’s a tough situation.
“I am 100 per cent hopeful no-one will lose their job because I don’t think anyone deserves to. I believe we are doing a good job at the FA.
“There are lessons to be learned but I am sure Martin will ensure we learn those lessons and nothing of this nature happens again in the future.”
Sampson’s career seems to be in tatters following his dismissal, which also came amid allegations of racism – for which he was twice cleared and fiercely denied – by England player Eni Aluko.
But when asked if it would be impossible for him to get another coaching role, Campbell added: “I hope not, because Mark Sampson has taken those players from 14th in the world to third in the world.
“I hope over time people will understand that whatever mistakes people make we can move on, and people need to be given another chance.”
Managerless England face France in a friendly next month before November’s World Cup qualifiers against Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kazakhstan.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here