AN abandoned proposal to develop a Trump Tower in Moscow during the 2016 presidential election was “solely a real estate deal and nothing more”, the personal lawyer for President Donald Trump told congressional staff.
Michael Cohen was appearing privately yesterday before the Senate Intelligence Committee, one of multiple congressional panels investigating Russian interference in the presidential race and potential ties to the Trump campaign.
Special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of investigators are conducting their own criminal investigation.
In a prepared statement, Cohen addressed revelations from last month that the Trump Organisation had considered doing business in Russia through a proposed Trump Tower in Moscow around the time of the Republican primaries.
Cohen disclosed details of the deal last month in a statement to the House intelligence committee, saying he had worked on the real estate proposal with Felix Sater, a Russian-born associate who has claimed to have connections to Moscow.
Cohen also said he emailed Russian president Vladimir Putin’s press secretary after Sater suggested the proposal would require approvals within the Russian government.
The discussions about the potential development occurred in the autumn of 2015, months after Trump had declared his candidacy, and ended early last year when Cohen determined the project was not feasible.
In his statement, Cohen said the proposal was “solely a real estate deal and nothing more”.
“I was doing my job,” he added.
The Trump Organisation has previously said the licensing deal “was not significantly advanced” and that no site or financing materialised during the negotiations.
Cohen also denounced allegations from a dossier produced by an opposition research firm, calling the document “lie-filled” and fabricated.
He said he had never discussed with any member of the Russian Federation or anyone else a plan to hack into email accounts or to interfere with the election.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here