By Scotland's Brexit Minister Michael Russell
TWENTY years ago, people across Scotland were celebrating the referendum result which restored a Scottish Parliament.
But today, the founding principles of the devolution settlement which people voted for so overwhelmingly in 1997 are endangered as never before.
That is because the Conservatives’ Brexit plans, as currently drafted, propose to take powers in relation to devolved policy areas in Scotland to Westminster.
The EU Withdrawal Bill contains provisions for the wholesale transfer of powers from Brussels to London – including in devolved policy areas such as farming and fishing.
That demolishes the principle outlined by Donald Dewar in framing Holyrood’s remit, which made clear that everything should be devolved to Edinburgh except those powers explicitly reserved to Westminster.
The Tories’ approach also means that if powers over areas such as agriculture are not returned from Brussels to Scotland – as they should be – then Scottish Ministers will be prevented from making any changes to current EU law in these areas, while Westminster will be able to change the law for England.
That would be a backward step, throwing the whole process of devolution into reverse.
For example, we do not believe that the hill farmers of Argyll, in my constituency, would be better served by policy on less favoured area support being made in London, where such support will never be needed and where knowledge of its vital nature is scant or non-existent.
We do not believe that ambitions for a greener Scotland should be undermined by UK ministers who have very different environmental priorities and who have championed de-regulation at every opportunity.
And we do not believe that the needs of Scottish families in crisis will be better understood by a Tory government which has constantly undermined the welfare state. The EU Withdrawal Bill appears to represent a deliberate decision by the Conservatives to use Brexit as cover for a naked power grab.
In total, the areas which could be affected runs to a list of 111 powers – and that is a list we will publish soon.
We are not alone in our view – Carwyn Jones, the Labour First Minister of Wales, has made clear his Government shares our position.
And there is independent confirmation from the Law Society of Scotland, which last week commented that the UK Government’s Brexit plans would “remove the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament” in areas including agriculture and fishing.
Yesterday, I made clear to Parliament we will not recommend that MSPs give consent to the EU Withdrawal Bill as it stands. And I was heartened at the indications of wide cross-party support.
This is a matter which goes beyond party politics to the core of Scottish democracy, and I believe Holyrood should be as united as possible in opposing the removal of powers which people voted for so overwhelmingly two decades ago.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel