A LAST-minute bill introduced in the Catalan parliament yesterday put Catalonia on course for a confrontation with Spain’s central government in Madrid over an independence referendum it plans to hold on October 1.
The conservative national government has already said the poll is illegal and immediately said it would challenge the Catalan government’s bill — which paves the way for it to be formalised — in the Spanish Constitutional Court.
Spain’s vice president Soraya Sáenz de Santamaría warned that passing the bill will have “serious consequences”, and that those responsible could face criminal charges.
The Catalan Prosecutors Office, a branch of the Spanish Prosecutors Office, said it would take legal moves against the five members of the Generalitat’s [Catalan government’s] bureau who tabled the bill.
Opposition parliamentarians tried to filibuster the bill, but the pro- indy majority in the parliament won through.
The bill enables the referendum result to be implemented 48 hours after the result is declared and has no minimum turnout requirement. Albert Royo Mariné, secretary general of the Diplomatic Council of Catalonia (Diplocat) told The National it was an historic day: “It is a victory of democracy, a historical day and a dream come true for many Catalans who want to vote on their political future, for many already passed away and who fought for this country, its freedom, its democracy.
“It is a pity that those MPs against indy avoid coming up with political arguments and hid behind filibustering.”
The vote in Barcelona came after the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Catalonia heard at a debate in London that any political arrests there would be “grotesque” and would “compound a constitutional crisis”.
Plaid Cymru MP Hywel Williams was speaking during the debate on the Catalan referendum hosted by the APPG – of which he is chair – and organised by the UK delegation of the Catalan National Assembly (ANC).
He said it was up to the people of Catalonia to decide the nature of their relationship with the rest of the world and specifically the Spanish government.
“From where I sit it looks as if the Madrid government is just refusing to concede what is really happening,” he said.
“It seems to me they are not addressing that political reality. It would be grotesque if electoral officials were to be locked out, politicians arrested and everything else that has been threatened over the last months and years.
“It would compound a constitutional crisis if arrests were made, a democratic crisis for the Spanish state and the European Union – an EU member apparently stifling debate, contrary to European values about democracy and participation.
“I think the Madrid government would do well to change its stance.”
The debate saw a panel of MPs and journalists put the case for and against Catalan independence to an audience of more than 100.
And indy-seeking Catalans found an unlikely ally in Tory MP Andrew Rosindell, who said Spain was at fault for refusing to respect the result of the poll.
He said: This referendum should not be happening under a cloud. The people of Catalonia have a right to make their own choices, decide their own destiny.
“The political reality is very clear. Where you have an historic nation that feels unhappy and uncomfortable in the position it is in, it should and must have the right and freedom to choose its own destiny. No democrat can argue with that.
“We had to accept that Scotland is a nation, not just a region of the UK. Spain seems to treat the nations in Spain as regions rather than nations in their historic context.
“Democracy must prevail – the people of Scotland had their choice and although the debate rumbles on and will rumble on for many more years to come, the reality is the UK Government did not try to prevent that referendum… The people of Catalonia should be respected whatever the decision on October 1.
“I personally will respect that decision and I hope the UK Government will do the same.”
SNP MP Douglas Chapman said there was one thing that stood out about the battle for Scottish independence, since campaigning started almost 70 years ago.
“It’s been a non-violent approach based on the law of democracy, and not one drop of blood has been spilt during the time we’ve been campaigning,” he said.
Chapman compared Scotland’s pre-referendum experience with London, that resulted in the Edinburgh Agreement and both sides’ acceptance of the result.
He added: “When I see what’s happening in Catalonia and Spain I can’t see what the end game might be in terms of respecting the outcome because you may receive an overwhelming amount of support to have your parliament based in Barcelona, or wherever, but how is Spain going to respect that outcome and how to you move the process on from where things might be in the early days of October?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel